Sanity anyone?

"It would be a mistake to think that we are out of combat capability," [Adm. Mullen] said.

2008-04-25T09:16:00.000-07:00

I love the Admiral's use of understated menace in that comment. Here's the whole article regarding Iran's most recent provocations in the Gulf region:

Fox News Article: Joint Chiefs respond to Iranian aggression

Unfortunately, he then waters it down a bit with the 'we prefer other options for now' disclaimer. But that's cool too, we certainly would prefer the mad mullahs think we're not about to attack them. Especially just before we do.

It's nice that US diplomacy once again has BIG TEETH, when necessary. Thank you President Bush, for that. Now, a statement like the one above by Admiral Mullen must be taken at face value, given full weight of consideration by our enemies. I truly hope they do think long and hard on their present course of nuclear action, Iraqi provocations, and dreams of a global Islamic caliphate.

But I doubt they will. The mullahs can only see their desires, it's the fatal flaw of Islam. Ahmanutjob will soon trot out a defiant, pointless, delaying denial and further provocations will ensue. Anything to delay and position for their imminent nuclear threats, of course.

A tremendous mistake, indeed. The clock is ticking...

Adios MF,

Doug

US GPO: Treason or just Stupidity?

2008-03-26T14:04:00.000-07:00

You be the judge, I'm leaning towards the former:

Washington Times Article: Outsourced Passports

Apparently GPO didn't get the 9/11 memo.

UFB!

Adios MF,

- Doug

Democrats: "Fuck tax cuts, more earmarks!"

2008-03-14T09:18:00.000-07:00

When will this nation STOP VOTING FOR DEMORATS? Their latest 'screw the people' legislation will cripple this economy and bloat our government, standard practice now for the socialists in the formerly proud Democrat Party:

Fox News article: Up Yours America!

I sincerely hope W still has his veto pen handy, this budget needs to go down in flames asap.

Adios MF,

Doug

Hamas Cheers Murdered Israeli Children, as Usual

2008-03-07T07:21:00.000-08:00

This is the government that leftist Europe and the entire Islamic caliphate-in-the-making wants the world to accept?

Fox News Article: Hamas cheers child murder

When they can take a break from indiscriminately raining rockets down on innocent Israeli civilians, Hamas loves to sneak right into children's classrooms to kill them. Fatah is no better, just inept compared to their degenerate Hamas rivals.

And of course the average Arab in region cheers such vile, barbaric acts. Notice I did NOT say Palestinians or Palestine - there is no such place as Palestine anymore, and no such people as Palestinians. And Muslims wonder why the entire world views them as backwards, ignorant reprobates. Take a look in the mirror Islam, if it's not haram.

Waiting for CAIR to condemn this disgusting, tragic event - but I'm not holding my breath. Such condemnation would just be further taqqiya anyway, additional manipulating lies. Since today is Friday I'm sure there will be wild celebrations in American mosques tonight, and further incitement to violence against non-Muslims, as usual. I hope the FBI is also in attendance - they are no longer completely abdicating their responsibilities with regard to Muslims, despite overwhelming pressure to do so from US Democrats.

We in the United States also will never forget that Muslims around the world cheered our devastating losses on 9/11 as well...I guess Muslims just can't change. Which does not bode well for them...

Adios MF,

Doug

UN Sec. Council to Israel: "Trust Me"

2008-03-03T15:19:00.000-08:00

The UN Security Council announced new sanctions today that Iran has already said they'll ignore:

Foxnews.com Article: New Sanctions

If anyone thinks Israel will sleep soundly now I've got a bridge to sell you. The UN is a toothless dog, allowing itself to be wagged by the biggest proliferator of them all, El Baradei. This man has done his best to weaponize Islamic militants around the world, and there will be no credibility in any UN action on Iran until he is gone.

Even then the UN is a toothless dog. Oh well, I say we have a NATO-style regional organization in southern east Asia. Establish AATO (Asia-America Treaty Organization). Make all middle and far eastern nations choose - stability or terrorism?

And do it before China does.

Then of course, kick the UN out of the US, withdraw our membership, cut our losses. It's win-win.

Adios MF,

Doug

McCain Considered Abandoning GOP

2008-02-01T06:16:00.000-08:00

Holy crap! I knew McCain was a foul, double-talking fascist in disguise. But it never occurred to me to consider that he would ponder betraying his electorate. Said betrayal being joining the political party of foul, double-talking fascists in disguise. My mistake:

The Hill Article

McCain is a scumwad. Vote Romney!

Adios MF,

Doug

McCain or Hitlery? I can't tell them apart...

2008-01-30T17:40:00.000-08:00

Democrats are doing their best to pick the GOP Presidential candidate for us, their latest attempt is RINO Sen. John McCain. O he of the McCain/Fiengold 1st Amendment attack. Mr. Keating 5. Together with Traitor John Kerry, the man who ended the US's search for Vietnam POWs/MIAs in 1991, then going into business with our former enemies.

And of current notoriety as Mr. Illegal Alien Amnesty.

Romney might be a little mealy mouthed, but he's at least flipping in the right direction - abandoning any former leftist positions daily. McCain actually DEFENDS his leftist insanity, his souless betrayal of Republicans, Conservatives, and the Military. The Senator from Arizona must NEVER be President. But I'll have to seriously sit down and think it over if it comes down to McStain or Hillary.

I'm praying for an Osama, oops, Obama candidacy. Any Republican could beat that twit, but I sure hope Romney takes the nomination. Romney would make short work of either Hill OR the junior Sen. from Illinois. Which is of course why the media is giving McCain all the good PR.

If it's McCain or Barak Hussein, I'd probably vote for the big-talking stupid kid. Lil' Barak is a one-termer for sure, and he'll spend way too much time running his mouth (as opposed to actually having a GOOD idea) to do much damage. McCain is too dangerous a snake, we'll be one Executive Order away from the 4th Reich.

However, as much as I love ya Ann I don't know if any circumstances could force me to vote for Hillary. Like you I would FEAR a President Hillary; unlike you, even more so than a Presidente (that's how Jaun will want it spelled if he wins) McCain:

Ann Coulter

But I'll certainly think about it, at least Hillary is a less-accomplished liar...

Adios MF,

- Doug

Big Brother in Canada: The Canadian 'Human Rights' Commission

2008-01-21T08:31:00.000-08:00

The Canadian Human Rights Commission is laid bare by our friend Mark Steyn, even better than the recent Ezra Levant video that's been circulating the web:

McLean's Article

Both gentlemen are currently under the screws by the Grand Inquisitors of the CHRC; the complaints brought by Canada's biggest fans of tyranny, Canadian Muslim 'leaders'. Canada's goofy socialists have created an almost perfect mind-crime vehicle for the government - a long term jobs program for politically correct leftists. Morons who think they can force a free human to think and feel as the Government wishes. Canada's radical Muslim Imam's have seized on yet another example of western foolishness to use against us.

What will bring CHRC down though is that it can't exist and operate in secret (a 1st requirement of any decent Star Chamber) with the Internet in the equation. Canadian legacy media has long ago sold out to the socialists, in the hopes of being the ONLY voice of the people - CBC will be no help in exposing their partners in Stalinism. But the Internet, key to publicizing other travesties of public betrayal like Rathergate, KerryGate, Ron Paul, etc, has been crucial in shining the light on this jackboot liberalism.

Sorry to disappoint the fascists, but via the web Messers. Steyn and Levant have successfully blown the lid off the CHRC. The fact that former CHRC employee Mr. Warman pretty much has such Big Brother power at his private disposal is very revealing, thank you for that very interesting bit of information Mr. Steyn. Ezra Levant's video denunciation of CHRC is brilliant and inspiring, my compliments Mr. Levant. I was also very pleased to find out that both Mr. Steyn and Mr. Levant have received many offers of free representation and donations to defray costs for fighting The Hoser (my term for Canada's version of 'The Man').

Like Mr. Steyn, I'm not surprised at all that Muslim fans of Sharia Law would jump whole-heartedly on the mind-crime bandwagon. When all evidence points to the truth about Islam - clearly it's the religion of mass-murder, terrorism, rape, misogyny, prejudice, slavery, genocide, and extortion - outlaw the presentation of such evidence.

Unfortunately, there are many in our own government (US Civil Rights Commission, State Dept., etc.) who would love this kind of tyranny. The US legacy media has sold out for the same reason as Canada's. Luckily, we watch our government a little closer, but it's not out of the realm of possibility in the US. Vigilance is key.

We're with you Mark and Ezra! Keep fighting the good fight - it may take time but your ultimate vindication is assured. The fact that Muslim fanatics are this desperate makes that perfectly clear.

Adios My Friends Mark and Ezra,

- Doug

Democrats Squabble for the Illegal Alien Vote

2008-01-18T06:59:00.000-08:00

Shrillary and the Mouth are trying to score points off each other, and downplay the fact that courting the Illegal vote is their main objective:

Fox News story about the Spanish-language election ad

The big question is, of course, why have a Spanish-language election ad at all? If a person has been here long enough to vote (7 years, isn't it?), they have certainly been here long enough to learn English as responsible American citizens.

This 'union-sponsored' ad praises the 1st-term, boy-Senator from Illinois for supporting caucus voting at Las Vegas casinos. Surely casinos only hire legal immigrants and American citizens? I say that with a big smile, I'm sure they rely on the union to check immigration status...

Careful avoidance by Democrats of the major issues of our generation (the War on Terror and Illegal Immigration) has permitted them to focus on getting out the fraudulent vote again, illegals, criminals, the deceased, etc. Watch for the MoveOn and other Soros thugs to start their work again very soon, if they're not already hard at it. Anytime a Democrat mentions 'union', what they really mean is 'gimme mah dough Georgie-boy!' (that last was in my best Shrillery-esque fake southern accent).

Vote Republican please, for anyone but that idiot Ron Paul. McCain and Huckabee are also suspiciously left on illegal immigration, and even more suspiciously, very popular with leftist media. Probably because neither has a prayer of beating even the best turd in the Democrat Presidential cesspool.

Every Democrat in the race is a failed politician or inexperienced fool. Funny how today's Dem's can only rally behind failed socialists, war traitors, sex-predator draft-dodgers, ethnic con-men, and hustlers. That their money comes from socialists like Soros, communists like China, and criminals like Wu is very telling...

Adios MF,

Doug

Pentagon & US Govt. Penetration, by Islamists and Communists

2008-01-05T06:08:00.001-08:00

Everyone who worries about our elected and appointed officials selling out the country to our sworn enemies ought to read this story:

Inside the Ring

So DOD Deputy Sec. England facilitates the penetration of Islamists, namely Muslim Brotherhood front groups into our innermost defense councils. Bush, Rice and co. facilitate Chinese communist penetration into upper levels of federal government policy.

SINCE WHEN does the US value Communist China's policies over Taiwan? WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING GEORGE BUSH?! I can see Condi being confused, she's the same bird brain that supports giving terrorists of Fatah a leg up over our traditional allies Israel. But YOU George? Your father spent a good part of his career fighting Chinese communists, both at CIA an as President of the US.

What happens to pro-American patriots when they ascend to high federal government posts? It seems pretty clear to me that their hidden treason soon finds its way out.

Ronald Reagan would have FIRED EVERYONE INVOLVED, if he stopped there. It seems pretty obvious that there's plenty of shady crap to be discovered in an independent investigation of how this espionage was allowed to happen.

Dep Sec. England, Bush, Condi - you are all scum-sucking traitors if you don't stop this nonsense once and for all. In this patriots opinion it's time for all of you to go - you've done enough damage. Just in case you've forgotten the priorities of the US citizens you work for:

Taiwan should be in the UN, as of a LONG time ago. They should enjoy our FULL SUPPORT always as the clearest challenge to communist China's bullshit ideology.

Anyone with a demonstrable past as a radical islamist, or with any connections to bastards of that ilk, ought to be arrested and investigated, not promoted over those actually fighting the greatest threat of our generation.

Is that clear now, dipshits? Holy crap, what imbeciles.

Adios MF,

Doug

Pigs Barrel-Roll: SF Media's Glimpse of Sanity

2007-12-19T13:57:00.000-08:00

The pigs are in combat-air patrol formation over San Francisco Bay's Golden Gate bridge today, a proud and glorious sight.

At SFGate.com today, a notoriously liberal website based in the San Francisco area (surprise!), there' s a fresh breeze blowing through columnist Cinnamon Stillwell's office. [I shall resist a cutesy name smile due to her (his? - in the interests of laziness I shall declare 'her') incredibly well-written piece.] At least someone on the left coast begins to understand what's at stake in the War on Terror:

Savage vs CAIR: The battle over free speech

Ms. Stillwell's article shows that she understands that western civilization, law, tradition, freedom, and tolerance are at stake. I really don't understand the reaction of liberal, gay, and mouthy San Francisco to the War on Terror - overwhelmingly against the leaders, soldiers, tools, and methods best deployed for waging and more importantly, winning the battle. The Quran makes clear what's in store for these Americans under the Islamic caliphate - persecution, torture, prison, and death. It's nice that at least some in this 'anti-war' city actually SEE the threat.

And even nicer that a SF web site will print such a well written expose on the chief propagandists for the terrorists, CAIR. WAY TO GO SFGATE.COM! Free speech is indeed under assault in America by CAIR, MAS, and many other fronts for Hamas, Hezbollah, Fatah, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Queda, Saudi Wahabbists, Iranian intelligence, etc.

But better batten down the hatches guys - I'm sure you'll be hearing from Islamist lawyers and politicians soon. Oh, and the San Francisco City Council will certainly now censure you for hate speech as well SFGate. Rest assured you'll be in good company with Michael Savage.

Adios MF,

Doug

Omaha Shooting Site was Gun-Free Zone

2007-12-06T15:20:00.000-08:00

How many more will have to die before the fascists will get off their gun-grabbing high horses?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,315563,00.html

All recent mass shootings have happened in 'gun free zones'. We should change the name of these zones - how about "all victims here are unarmed, come and shoot as many as you like" zones? Is there anyone left in this country that doesn't know that personal concealed carry laws SAVE LIVES?!

Gun Free Zones my ass. Yet ANOTHER incredibly stupid liberal Democrat idea that kills innocents on a daily basis.

"Support Violent Crime, Vote Democrat!"

Adios,

MF

Steven King - Wuss!

2007-11-27T10:33:00.000-08:00

You'd think the master of fantasy, fear, and carnage fiction would a have little gonadinal fortitude:

Fox News Article: Steven King: "Water Board Jenna Bush"

"Yo Steve, shut up and write." Oh, and please, PLEASE kill that ridiculous Wastelands series? What the hell were you thinking there? You want to do a series - do another book or two on The Stand characters/storyline? FYI, you probably don't remember, but you wrote that masterpiece back when you could tell the difference between good and evil...

If Steven King doesn't have the nerve to do what must be done to protect the freedom-loving innocents of the world from Islamic tyranny, that's okay. We already have plenty of brave soldiers who do.

If you can't help at least shut up and get out of the way - our soldiers won't let IT get you Stevie...they have lots of silver bullets.

Adios MF,

Doug

It's not 200, but Sudanese Islamists do try: 40 Lashes!

2007-11-26T10:26:00.000-08:00

As I've mentioned recently, there are just no words for silly, murderous, inhumane, and criminal Islamic doctrine. This article speaks for itself, although that almost never stops me anyway:

Fox News Article: British Teacher Faces 40 Lashes for Naming Class Teddy Bear 'Muhammad'

But the title is misleading, shame on you Fox. She didn't name the teddy bear, the class did. In other words, Muslims named the teddy bear Muhammed.

Islamic sharia law: No problem, lash the foreign, non-Muslim teacher!

Now that's some good ol' law, morally equivalent to western law and morality in every way, according to the NY Times, CNN, Democrats, etc. If I was Muslim, this blog post might have some impact, but because I'm not it will be written off by the western left as right wing bigotry.

So just for the record, I'm not bigoted in any way except maybe against savage criminals masquerading as Muslims (or Christians, Jews, etc. for that matter)...oh, and of course Mexicans! :>) As an early Minuteman volunteer I was branded for life as a bigot by leftist media, and even President Bush. But really, it's just that I don't like criminals as much as they do.

At the (very small) risk of sounding bigoted, I shall use my wickedly condemned JUDGMENT to declare that this blogger will not submit to Islam or Sharia law (in fairness I have at least qualms with all religions). I JUDGE historic and in large part today's Islam to be a religion of tyrants and fools, and I'm fond of neither. In my considered JUDGMENT, moderate Muslims ought to convert if they've no stomach for silencing the radical mainstream all around them.

Adios MF,

Doug

Maryland Voters Get What They Voted For: Democrat Tax Hikes

2007-11-19T06:49:00.001-08:00

I've been saying for years now that a vote for a Democrat is a vote for terrorism. However, I've also been saying for years that a vote for a Democrat is a vote for tax hikes. Recently Marylanders elected a flaming liberal tax-and-spend Democrat Governor in Martin O'Malley, and also again gave the MD legislature a Democrat majority. I wonder if they're surprised now that the State is of course raising taxes, big time:

The Washington Times

PLEASE stop voting for Democrats - they are not interested in the well-being of this nation. Clearly they only care about personal power and money, with every vote they demonstrate their perfidy. Democrats will lie through their teeth, they'll say ANYTHING to get elected. But when it comes down to it, NONE of their ideas are good for this nation.

So I will now add to my mantra:

Formerly: Vote Democrat, Support Terrorism!

Now: Vote Democrat, Support Terrorism and Tax Increases!

Adios MF,

Doug

Saudi Gang Rape Victim Gets 200 Lashes, NOW Yawns

2007-11-16T18:04:00.000-08:00

Kudos to our enlightened media, who barely noticed this story. Even Fox barely gave it a half a page.

So after suffering a violent gang rape at the hands of 'crazed men', lovely Wahabbi Islam will now do their best to execute the victim. The fucking raping scum got some jail time (who wants to bet they'll be out by summer?), but the poor 19-year-old woman will now be beaten virtually to death:

Fox News Story

Ah yes, the wisdom of this advanced culture. How can one explain to these savages? "Uh, hello? Achmed? You got it a little backwards dude - lash the RAPISTS to death, not the rape-ee?

But the big question of the day is WHERE IN THE NAME OF ISIS IS THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF WOMEN, AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL COUNTERPARTS? NOW has lately been very busy shutting down Bush programs benefiting poor mothers by educating the fathers, I can understand their missing this whole Islamic misogyny thing. But what about the UN? Is there any feminist left alive in Europe? Asia? Jeez, I'd settle for Canada at this point.

The silence of these so-called women's groups is deafening. And cowardly, reprehensible, disgusting, - I can go on all day. I've blogged about NOW's complete betrayal of 600 million Islamic women before, but they're too busy hating Bush to give a shit about a religious Arab culture that is about to lash a young woman 200 times. I hope the compassionate Allah makes the Imams at least let the woman heal from her gang rape first.

If ever there was a culture that was better off dying out in desert during the nomadic middle ages, it's Wahabbi Islam, fundamentalist death cult that it is. Don't get me wrong, the Shiite Islam that is practiced in Iran and Lebanon is just as virulent and backwards, as is Egypt's fundie Islam, and Syria's, Sudan's, etc. The moderate Muslim is clearly a minority as far as I can see - they only exist in a country that practices freedom of religion, honors a well-rounded education, and cherishes individual freedom and responsibility. Which of course leaves every Islamic nation out.

American Muslims (and NOW, for that matter) should be in the streets daily denouncing fundamentalist Islam, it's only allowed to exist because moderates permit it through their silence and funding. All I hear from American Muslims is CAIR-whining, victimhood claims. CAIR ought to talk to 911 families, Iraqi democrats, Sudanese Christians if they're sincerely interested in understanding victims.

Or in particular, CAIR ought to talk to this young Saudi woman before she is lashed to death for the Arab crime of being a woman.

Adios MF,

Doug

US Winning in Iraq? Must be a typo...

2007-10-15T10:00:00.001-07:00

While I'm here, how about a rare third daily post?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301715,00.html

Glad to see at least Fox News will grudgingly admit (in fairness, they linked to this story from their front page) that we are in fact winning in Iraq. The Surge is working, despite all claims to the contrary from Democrats and leftist media. So sorry Reid and Pelosi, to rain on your anti-US parade. Putzes.

Keep it up boys and girls serving in Iraq, and everywhere! This nation is still behind you, despite our lefty loudmouths.

Adios My Friends,

Doug

Democrats Insult NASCAR Fans

2007-10-15T07:23:00.000-07:00

I'm late to this gaffe by the Democrat chairman of the Homeland Security Committee. Most Republicans have already made some hay with this, I hope the rest do:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301684,00.html

But it certainly is symptomatic of Democrat regard for southerners. It's almost as funny as Democrat attempts to appear religious to win over southerners, and just as wrong-headed. It'll be interesting to hear Democrat candidate response to this...

I'm sure we'll hear about this over and over during the runup to the 2008 elections. Hope so!

Adios MF,

Doug

Bad News Doug Lee: These days the media IS largely the enemy.

2007-10-15T07:03:00.000-07:00

I love to see old media whining that no one will talk to them anymore. So why do you supposed that is reporters? Might it be due to the fact that most legacy media actively aides our terrorist and socialist enemies? Or maybe it has something to do with invasion of privacy? Or crassly intruding on the grief of recently bereaved citizens? Or outright lying to destroy political enemies? Or lazy journalism designed to fit a socialist political agenda? I could go on and on...

This is the wave of the future, I hope:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301704,00.html

At the very least it's one additional death knell for the fifth column in our midst. Good riddance!

Adios MF,

Doug

Gen. Kearney, a terrorist's best friend.

2007-10-10T15:33:00.000-07:00

Here's a General who never should have been:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071010/FOREIGN/110100079/1001

Kearney's forgotten the first rule of command, PROTECT YOUR MEN. A moron who's never figured out that a battlefield is not a courtroom, combat is not patty-cake, and officers are not babysitters. Bet Kearney learned leadership from that putz Wes Clarke when he was in Bosnia.

Kearney's another Murtha, guarranteed - he'll retire and run for office on the Democrat ticket. Bet me.

The enemy within - just as dangerous as terrorists, if not more.

UPDATE: Gen. Kearney's spokesperson attempts damage control:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071011/FOREIGN/110110039/1001&template=nextpage

Yeah, right Kearney. I still hold to my take on this incident - that this armchair general is working on a post-military political career as a Democrat. I think Rep. Rohrbacher has a great bead on this military moron:

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, said: "It would appear that the general has his priorities [wrong]. His job is not to try to curry favors with the liberal media ... ."

"No one should ever ignore when our people are acting in an illegal or immoral way, but neither should commanding officers try to demoralize them by exaggerating any fault they find and giving the benefit of the doubt to the enemy, rather than to our own people."

Exactly. In particular with SOC soldiers/marines, whose missions include many that push right up against (but NOT over) the edge of legality. A SOC boss ought to know better - there's no excuse for this kind of betrayal except a personal agenda and/or incompetence. Both of which in anybody's book are grounds to relieve this schmuck of his command, and then cashier him.

I look forward to a DOD investigation of this chump, I smell a leftist PR plot...

Adios MF,

Doug

GW Poster-Nazis - EXPEL THEM!

2007-10-10T14:56:00.000-07:00

Time to see if GW has a zero-tolerance policy for bigotry and/or at least SLANDER. If this issue isn't a clear-cut case of slander, I don't know what is:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071010/METRO/110100102/1001&template=nextpage

I personally think these socialist idiots should not only be expelled, but also prosecuted to the full extent of the law for slander. Then sued in civil court for damages and emotional distress. They should get the book thown at them, big time! Pour encourager les autres!

False accusations are a typical leftist, nazi tactic. Shout down the enemy with lies and volume.

I think that's how the Nazis started WWII; justifying the attack against Poland by performing 'terrorism' on German soil and then blaming the Poles. Funny how lefties keep getting caught using reprehensible, despicable tactics that they loudly, constantly attribute to their enemies, isn't it? But that's Communism 101 stuff, accuse your enemies first, then do exactly the same thing with full immunity and no shame.

Too bad socialism is such a failure. It would almost be fun to once again debate the finer points of Marxist theory with larval commies like these, but I can never find one anymore when I'm in the mood. One hundred years of failure kind of dries up the socialist recruiting drive, you only get aspiring retards like these GW punks. (No offense to our mentally-challenged friends).

BOUNCE 'EM GW! THEN BOOK 'EM DANO!

Adios MF,

Doug

Global Warming: $1 Trillion+ Ripoff

2007-10-09T07:32:00.000-07:00

Excellent article on FoxNews.com today about the incredible Con of the Century, global warming:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299419,00.html

Eco-grifters are exposed, and they don't like it one bit. Global warming is just a scam, designed to accelerate the left's agenda of global socialism. Al Gore is only their most recent poster boy - but I guess he needed a job that endears him to the left. Michael Crichton's recent book "State of Fear" is a good take down on the GW scam too, I heartily recommend this book to anyone who wants to get an idea about the dangers of the global eco-terrorism movement.

But just in case there's a grain of truth in any of this global warming nonsense, I propose that we drill ANWAR and our many coastal oil finds, and supplement that with a massive increase in nuclear power plants. I'm sure the leftists would prefer that over global warming since these won't end the world?

Adios MF,

Doug

MoveOn: All your 1st Amendment are belong to us!

2007-10-06T09:16:00.000-07:00

Typical leftist oppression, popularized by scientologists, but now moved into the realm of politics by George Soros and his jackbooted liberal nazis. MoveOn is threatening legal action against its critics, like the soviet wannabes they are. I wonder how so many people can ignore the history and dangers of socialism? After all, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot - ALL SOCIALISTS.

The current leftist slogan must be: "100 Years of Failure Means NOTHING!" Yo Soros! It means a lot to us 'masses'...

The Washington Times online has a great article by Michelle Malkin about MoveOn's threats:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071006/COMMENTARY/110060014

I would really appreciate the FEC looking into MoveOn's massive voter fraud programs too, say sometime before the next presidential election? It's not too much to ask that Soros NOT be allowed to elect Democrats through voter fraud is it? Between lefty 'push' polling and MoveOn voter shenanigans it's a miracle Sean Penn isn't president.

Adios MF,

Doug

Dem. Rep. Obey: Defund the Troops

2007-10-04T07:10:00.000-07:00

The Democrats threaten to defund our troops to force an Iraqi withdrawal:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071003/NATION/110030087/1001

The Democrats have been lusting over the opportunity to turn Iraq into another Vietnam. But just like Vietnam, our soldiers refuse to cooperate by losing the war. Just like Vietnam, Iraqis refuse to denounce and expel US soldiers, contrarily begging them to stay, and win. Just like Vietnam, the Democrats willingly work alongside the PR and PsyOp teams of our enemies in order to demoralize and defeat our military.

The only difference this time, and it's a big difference, is that he military rank and file OVERWHELMINGLY approve of their mission and want very much to win - they are ALL VOLUNTEERS (Dems HATE that). During Vietnam Democrats (cleverly programmed by our communist enemies) were somewhat successful in turning naive public opinion against the war, and subsequently, drafted soldiers as well. Once successful in forcing our withdrawal, Democrats conveniently turned their attention away from the massive, genocidal pogroms that followed, when the communists killed millions the US had pledged to protect.

Democrats HATE the military, they have always hated the military, and they always will hate the military. Men with guns are a direct challenge to implementing socialism in this country. Lenin knew what he was talking about - take their guns THEN dictate their lives. Democrat Representative David Obey is just the latest in a long line of anti-American defeatocrats in the donkey party. Like the Democrat traitors before him, Obey would see us all dead if it will ensure his reelection next year.

Obey is a traitor, and should be recalled/impeached, or whatever you do with US Representatives that betray the nation. Obey is lucky that we don't hang traitors anymore. But Obey is just an indicator of what this nation will suffer should the Democrats win the Presidency in 08, and maintain their majorities in the Senate and House.

Luckily, Republicans and most Democrats know that defunding the military is political suicide - they know this IS NOT Vietnam all over again.

Just remember: A vote for a Democrat is a vote for terrorism.

Adios MF,

Doug

Clarence Thomas: Democrats Worse than KKK

2007-10-02T21:05:00.000-07:00

Way to go Clarence Thomas - testify!

A former Kleagle of the KKK is now a Democrat Clarence, Sen. Byrd of WV is surely giving Democrats lessons on character assassination. Amazing how Democrats will violate every principle, law, and cherished national ideal in order to push their agenda of power, oppression, and socialism. Excellent interview by FOX:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299019,00.html

We need a bunch more judges like Mr. Thomas. Hopefully some more bad judges will retire soon and W can undo more of the damage the leftist court did over the last few decades by appointing more conservatives. Thank goodness for Roberts and Alito, but we need more!

Oh! And in 2008 a vote for a Democrat is clearly a vote for terrorism. Vote Republican for President! Vote conservative for Senate/Congress/everything else!

Adios MF,

Doug

I'm so proud...

2007-08-12T19:12:00.000-07:00

One of my comments on a Little Green Footballs (Charles Johnson's fabulous blog exposing the current worldwide threat of Islamic terror) thread was cherry picked by a poster on Daily KOS, a leftist, anti-military, anti-semitic, anti-American website. It's not every day that one can generate such a spewing rage from a leftist imbecile! See below for the fun!

My post was the first one where note bene discarded any pretense at logic/reason, and just blew a blood vessel. I must have struck a very exposed nerve with my "Support terrorism, vote Democrat" comment. Heh.

My fellow Lizards on LGF are insanely jealous, with one post I have achieved Legendary Lizard status. Even if I only say so myself. :>D They've also joined in, "Support terrorism, vote Democrat" is now all over the site.

Note bene cherry picked a bunch of comments from a LGF thread about Democrats embracing DKOS as a 'mainstream' website. The 4th one was mine, in bold:

#26 wvobiwan 8/12/2007 12:16:43 pm PDT reply quote report

re: #10 wee fury

hummm -- their top 3 priorities for the nation . . . and they FORGOT to include the War on Terror. Insanity
That is not forgetfulness, that is the Dem 2008 strategy - there is no WOT.

This if course is even worse than insanity, it's direct support of the terrorist enemy. Can you imagine Ahmadegenerate's and Zawa the Hut's glee watching the Democratic 'debates'? Democrats are way beyond unpatriotic, they're dangerous.

My bumper sticker: "Support terrorism, vote Democrat".

This is KOS Kid note bene's rant about it:

LMFAO--listen, douchebag, do us all a favor and go say that on national TV. We can always use another screencap of a wild-eyed half-literate nutcase spouting discredited bullshit.

Do us another favor and put that fucking crap on your car....has it dawned on you imbeciles that the country is sick of the F.U.D. yet? Has it occured to you fucking sycophantic lickspittle wannabe-fascists that the country has heard no shortage of "support terrorism, vote Democrat [sic]" over the last six years and despite that still voted in the Democrats in November?

Evidently not....

Awesome! "Sycophantic", "lickspittle", and "fascist" all in one sentence! That's gotta be some kind of a record.

I love it when a leftist head explodes under the crushing pressure of logic and reason! I'm the man.

Adios MF,

Doug

Democrats: It's not abuse of power if we do it.

2007-08-04T06:43:00.000-07:00

The most recent shameful Democrat abuse of power:

The Washington Times

So. The lowest congressional approval rating ever recorded. 300+ investigations. Attempts to pass Shamnesty, eliminate whistle-blower protections on terrorism reporters, defund the US military, impeachment push despite lack of cause, and on and on.

Way to go America. Democrats are only interested in power folks, stop voting for them please?

Adios MF,

Doug

North: It's Radical Islam, stupid!

2007-07-09T11:55:00.000-07:00

Excellent piece today in FoxNews.com online by Col. Oliver North, describing the lefitst media's agenda-driven coverage of the latest UK Islamic terrorist actions:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288261,00.html

It's a shame that Ollie even has to explain this; a travesty of socialism-driven reportage in supposedly 'western' media. How is it leftists can keep ignoring Islamic terrorism? BECAUSE ANY TOOL SOCIALISTS CAN USE TO DESTROY FREE MARKET CAPITALISM IS GOOD WITH THEM. "The enemy of my enemy" and all that. Both the socialists and the terrorists 'know' they'll destroy the other when the time is right. (If not for my faith in freedom-loving citizens in the US, UK, Australia, etc., my money would be on the terrorists in their eventual showdown with legacy media. But we'll protect the leftists too, although most of them certainly could use a beating or two.)

Islamists nod and wink, and do their bloody-minded, depraved best to kill all westerners, and any less 'enthusiastic' muslims who might get in the way. So-called journalists reciprocate by running free public-relations campaigns for the murderers - even to the point of spinning obvious child murders into 'heroic resistance by "insurgents" or "militants"'. When they even bother to report them at all that is - see Michael Yon's recent Bless the Beasts and Children piece: http://michaelyon-online.com/wp/bless-the-beasts-and-children.htm. Here's a first-hand account of al Queda's insidious, child murdering tactics, their barbaric Islam-justified atrocities laid bare.

But not one peep from leftist media. Fox News at least linked an article on their site to Michael Yon's piece, although you had to hunt for it. Not one leftist journo has since showed up to verify the facts, not one bleeding heart for truly innocent Iraqi blood. If I didn't despise leftist media before, this alone would do it.

In Col. North's opinion piece he mentions legacy media's agenda - attempting to force the Coalition from Iraq, and even Afghanistan. Old media knows what happens when a population gets a taste of true freedom - it utterly destroys any chance for socialism. The leftists have to stop Iraq before it succeeds, as it absolutely will. The net effect of leftist media's pro-jihadi campaign is to extend and maximize the bloodshed, just like they did in Vietnam 30 years ago.

Should they be successful, again just like in Vietnam, they will simply ignore the mass murder and atrocities that will surely follow as Islamic mafias backed by Iran, Syria, and Saudi Arabia will fight to the death for sway. Socialists think they'll con Iraqis to communism when its only other rival is barbaric Islamic theocracy, a clever idea. But unfortunately for the socialists it depends on Iraqis failing at democracy, and failing quickly.

I personally think it's too late for the Stalinists/Maoists that infest today's legacy media - Iraqis have already had their first elections and support a thriving free media of their own. Due to the latter, Iraqis know who the real enemies are - all the 'militants, insurgents, and freedom fighters' extolled in leftist western media. And of course leftist western media itself - left to think for themselves, no one can escape the logical conclusion that leftist media is just as big a threat to freedom as Islam. Even a culture supposedly 'incapable of Jeffersonian democracy' knows this, as leftist media loves to insulting refer to free Iraqis.

But the good news is that the web is slowly but surely making all legacy media obsolete, thank goodness. Looking forward to the day when the NYT has to be given away free on corners for lack of readership - Pinch is the worst of the leftist bunch.

Adios MF,

Doug

So someone is listening after all?

2007-06-23T10:51:00.001-07:00

There's a good article today from Steve Dinan (an excellent reporter who's coverage of the illegal invasion has been key in the fight to stop it) in the Washington Times online:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070623/NATION/106230056/1001

Bloggers and talk radio are making an impact, but I think the article fails to include another key facet of the resistance to the latest amnesty legislation: NO ONE IN THIS COUNTRY, INCLUDING RECENT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS, WANTS THIS LEGISLATION. Except of course for vote-pandering politicians and their slave-labor corporate campaign supporters.

What's especially interesting in this case is that for once leftist media finds itself on the side of George Bush. George, that ought to tell you something about your ridiculously corrupt position on the illegal alien issue. Leftist media's agenda for the destruction of democratic, free-market capitalism is better served when there are no sovereign borders. Someone on the President's staff should have spent more time educating him about that.

The media knows that open borders will lead to the massive redistribution of wealth that is key to socialism. What's conveniently left out of all pro-amnesty comments from politicians and media is the fact that we conservatives are pro-immigrant, NOT PRO-ILLEGAL. We welcome all legal immigrants to the US, provided they adopt our laws and culture as their own, or at least our laws. Leftists and the President are doing their best to spin us as racist, ignorant, anti-immigrant, etc, but the average person on the street sees right through that. A contributing factor to the comment above about how no one wants the new amnesty legislation.

Open borders are not conservative, patriotic, or in our economic interest no matter how hard Democrats and media spin it. I guess I have to include the President and some Republicans in that group-spin, sadly.

Defeat this legislation once and for all! Keep it up bloggers and talk radio!

Politicians: Enforce our borders by funding and mandating existing law! End birthright citizenship! Punish illegal alien employers! Build a border fence and stop at least 95% of illegal traffic - then we'll talk about the criminals already in our country.

Adios MF,

Doug

It's Official: I love Ann Coulter!

2007-06-17T12:16:00.000-07:00

It's been a long-running, passionate, and completely unrequited whirlwind romance (Ann I would have told you about it, but you're a pretty busy chick). However, I can contain the feeling no more; Ann Coulter, I love you. (In every non-ligitory, lawful, un-creepy, and please-don't-have-me-arrested sense of the word, of course.)

There's a million reasons why, but here's the latest one:

Ann's latest web-column, "No Drug Smuggler Left Behind": http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi

All kidding aside, Ms. Coulter scores big with another literary ass-whuppin' - my honey's rhetoric is as funny and deadly accurate as always. Our elected leader's conduct on illegal immigration is a disgusting, and even traitorous abdication of federal government responsibility. Ann has a unique way of driving home that point so forcefully that it goes all the way through, reverses direction, and pirouettes enough to make any skater green with jealousy.

Much as I love her, Ann would have to let me win an argument every now and then or I'll, I'll, ...just continue losing them. :>D But I bet I can still open pickle jars that she can't!

Nice work and keep 'em comin' baby. XOXOXO!

Adios M(y) F(riend),

Doug

UN's Melkert: "Did not! Did not did not did not!!

2007-06-15T19:44:00.000-07:00

"And you can't prove that the UN is supporting yet another psychotic fascist's nuclear ambitions with the money you gave us to fight poverty! We're the UN, just give us the money and shut up."

Fox has another UN scandal du jour - it appears that UN anti-poverty money has been funding Kim Jong Il's nuclear program:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,283075,00.html

So, a new General Secretary from South Korea and then suddenly everyone seems to know about a long running con to prop up the PRK Pixie, ol' Long Jong Iller? I know the FBI and State Department get a bad rap (and deserve it for the most part), it appears that they do occasionally get it together. I hope the General Secretary is behind the push to expose any PRK corruption of the UN Development Program, time will tell.

At the very least Melkert needs to be fired for his refusal to turn over records. This is not the EU Mel, we will have accountability with OUR money.

Can we NOW talk about the getting the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US? Can we end the nonsense about the world needing the UN to survive? How much more evidence does anyone need to overcome doubts that the UN has aided and abbetted most of the worst crimes against humanity since WWII? Islamic terrorism, WMD proliferation, genocide, robbing the starving, rape, fascism, racism, totalitarianism, global warming scamming, election fraud - no crime is left behind at the UN.

Adios MF,

Doug

Bush: 'Screw all you Conservatives' isn't nice?

2007-06-07T05:49:00.000-07:00

Yo George! Conservatives want to solve the real problem - foreigners flagrantly ignoring our borders, spitting on US National Sovereignity.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070607-123059-3709r.htm

In my opinion, the original House bill on this subject was most appropriate: Close the borders first, then we'll decide what to do with the 12-20 million illegals in this country. If we have the door closed it's a lot easier to concentrate on criminals who have already come in.

Bush and the Senate have a different agenda, obviously. They'd prefer to sell out US citizens to big business in favor of slave labor. Can't have the threat of terrorists marching freely over our borders derail the gravy train of illegal immigration! As Dennis Miller said, "We love immigrants - just sign the damn guest book first."

Bush and any politician supporting this travesty of amnesty legislation are clearly caught by the system. Politicians like this think we citizens are stupid, lazy, fear-mongering, etc. and therefore our 'betters' think, like for children, they need to do 'what's best for us'. No. What's best for us is to remove all of you lying, thieving, betraying, elitest scumbags from elected office, and we will.

Even LEGAL immigrants hate the current amnesty sell out in the Senate. I've sent anti-amnesty letters to both of my Senators and my congresswomen. However, my senators are Byrd and Rockefeller, they're even worse than Bush on this subject, if that's possible. My congresswoman is Shelley Capito, a weak-kneed conservative who has already voted against the troop surge and constantly makes noises like a Democrat regarding the WOT. No guts at all.

We need a new political party, a sane conservative group who's leaders won't betray their voters. I've stood by Bush through everything, voted for him twice. But not this - I'm sure Bush and Congress's next job approval poll will reflect the mass defection. Very strange priorities among our elected leaders, considering none of these illegals can legally vote - but that, I'm sure, is on the agenda should they succeed in legalizing this foreign invasion.

Secure the border FIRST! Down with amnesty, deport all illegals! Just because you say the latter is impossible doesn't make it so. During a recent hurricane in the Houston area, upwards of 5 million people moved 100s of miles west within a day or two. So with public transportation, a citizenship verification system, and a REAL mandate, deporting 20 million people could work easier than most think.

As I said above, I'd be willing to negotiate to keep the non-violent, the hard working, the tax-paying, the skilled, and those who truly are willing to adopt American language and culture. But only after the the borders are secure. Period.

"Comprehensive" is now the new buzzword for the most massively corrupted domestic legislation of our time.

Adios MF,

Doug

Republicans, Bush Betray Base on Illegal Immigration

2007-06-04T04:47:00.000-07:00

According to this article in the on line Washington Times, there doesn't seem to be much hope for defeating the worst immigration legislation ever devised:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070603-112508-8036r.htm

KISS THE 2008 ELECTION GOODBYE REPUBLICANS. We average Americans expect betrayal and lies from Democrats, but we had hoped that the GOP would stand by us. Unfortunately, with the exception of Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, and maybe Fred Thompson there doesn't seem to be any Republican worthy of the name anymore.

Therefore, the entire Republican Party gets my semi-annual Moonbat Award.

For conspicuous ignorance about the will of the people, for callous disregard of the best interests of the country, and for reprehensible betrayal of the very people who voted for them, the GOP wins, hands down, the semi-annual Sanity Anyone Barking Moonbat Award.

No matter how hard I try, I just can't understand the GOP's seeming aversion to winning elections. What's so hard to understand about "NO AMNESTY"? George Bush has completely abandoned his own base on this issue, and it disgusts me.

Up until now W's legacy has been solid and intact, the War on Terror is a very good thing. But the President has now thrown it all away with his condoning of the Mexican invasion, their complete disregard for US national sovereignity. Way to go George, now you'll go down in history as a clearly inept yokel, just like the Democrats have been saying from the beginning. I hate to admit that liberals and leftists are right about anything, but by his own actions on illegal immigration President Bush has confirmed their opinion of him.

Adios MF,

Doug

DC Victims to be Legally Armed: Democrats Disappointed

2007-05-09T05:05:00.000-07:00

Finally some sane rulings on DC's unconstitutional gun ban. The US Fed. Appeals Court reversed the ban in March, and here they deny the 'we didn't like that ruling, let us try again' appeal from the city:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20070508-115457-4155r.htm

REVERSED MEANS REVERSED! The Mayor, police, and the rest of the liberals are desperate now; they have to stop this before it's enacted and crime rates drop by 70% over the first weekend. Nothing facilitates crime-prevention (not to mention government by and for the people) like a strong public awareness and participation in the good ol' 2nd Amendment. And if you have lower crime, you need less taxes for it and more importantly, there's less work for the lawyers - can't have that!

Gotta love those founding fathers - they knew the govt. would come after our guns over and over. It's just a modern leftist politician's nature, can't be helped when elected government service becomes a life-long career, a personal quest for power. It's of course predominant on the Democrat side, but there are also Republicans on that runaway train too.

I especially loathe Chief Robinson's opportunistic, disgusting use of the Virginia Tech massacre as an argument FOR gun control. VT, like most schools, is a Gun Free Zone, a liberal program that ensures only criminals have guns on campus. In particular, VT is a campus where every student is an adult, and thus clearly guaranteed the right to bear arms. The Gun Free Zone program was one of Cho's tools for murdering those people, every bit as necessary and deadly as his pistols. If only one of those 32 victims had a handgun the rest might have survived.

Chief Robinson should be ashamed of himself. Mayor Fenty is still trying to keep DC victims disarmed, but his last attempt, appealing to the US Supreme Court, is obviously doomed. And, DC's SCOTUS failure could very well lead to the rollback of gun bans everywhere, which would be wonderful news.

Excellent, and thank goodness for Bush's SCOTUS appointments.

Adios MF,

Doug

Democrat Reid: We lost, time to cut and run!

2007-04-20T17:42:00.001-07:00

Not to be outdone by Pelosi/Hoyer's usurpation of Presidential powers; surrending Israel to Syria, Egypt, and Iran, Senate Majority Leader Democrat Harry Reid has now surrendered for the US in Iraq, Presidential prerogative be damned:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267324,00.html

I just ordered 5 new copies of my bumper sticker:

Democrats: Making the World Safe for Terrorists

After less than 2 weeks the first one has already been vandalized by some 'free speach' Democrat. No problem, I plan to sport one, undamaged, on my bumper all the way to the 2008 election. And if I catch the Democrat vandal who's violating my right to free speach I'll attempt to remind him of the First Amendment, by way of the Second.

Adios MF,

Doug

Only in America: Criminals Suing Cops

2007-04-02T11:44:00.000-07:00

This is what happens when our elected leaders, President Bush included (and sadly most importantly), ignore the security and sovereignity of our nation.

That these illegals are suing the cops is key, illegals know our legal system as well or better than natives. But they SHOULD BE SUING PRESIDENT BUSH AND OUR LEGISLATURE:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070402-124417-5149r.htm

How much more of this are US citizens going to have to take before vigilantism gets the better of them George? This nation's citizens have a long history of rising up against government repression and corruption, or have you in DC forgotten? Do you understand what is going to happen if the terrorists who commit the next 9/11 accessed this country with a nuclear weapon over the Mexico/Arizona border?

Our short-sighted, greedy, sell-out legislature and President will be negligently responsible for the deaths of thousands, mabye millions, both US citizens and illegal aliens.

Adios MF,

Doug

NOW: What's Anti-Bush about Islamic Misogeny?

2007-03-29T17:34:00.000-07:00

There's an article today on Foxnews.com, Brit Hume's Special Report, about the National Organization for Women (NOW) filing a discrimination complaint against the Bush Administration:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,262582,00.html

It seems the President's "Promoting Responsbile Fatherhood Initiative" is only for fathers, in other words [shudder], men. A program designed to benefit women by teaching responsible living, job, and fatherhood skills to men is under attack by these 'champions' of womanhood. NOW can't publicly promote execution for men (yet), but they can certainly get rid of any support for those betraying mothers. How DARE these women have sex with a man?! And not get an immediate abortion?! "And Isis help you if you have a male child you, you traitorous bitch!"

Actually, it surprises me to know that NOW is still in existence - I've heard nothing from them since Bush began to stand up to the women-hating, raping, vagina-mutilating, sexist Islamic terrorists. That seems odd somehow...especially since the Wahabbist scum have installed their sludge in our own country. I thought the first word in NOW was "National"...?

Could it be that NOW will, instead of defending women worldwide, condemn 600 million Islamic women to slavery, chattledom, sexual assault, forced marraige, honor-killing, burqas, and despair in a heartbeat if it helps hurt President Bush? Islam is the ultimate anti-Bush, NOW couldn't care less about the complete betrayal of everything for which the group was supposed to stand. Those half-a-billion Muslim women can just go soak their amputated clitorises.

Or is it that NOW is just frightened of those bad ol' Islamic men, who will in fact use their overwhelming upper-body strength to kill the feminists first? Wait a minute, if NOW admits fear of men, any men, it's going to be difficult to keep up the 'women are no different than men' mantra, isn't it? Also, what are they going to do about getting protection against the Islamonazis? Do you think NOW is secretly counting on the male-dominated, misoginistic US Military to save their furry little legs? That must make for interesting policy discussions.

NOW's behavior towards the most heartbreaking feminist travesty OF ALL TIME, Islam (radical and otherwise), is a clear case of abdication. NOW has thrown every Islamic woman in the world under the Bush Bashing Bus; all women cannot help but be tarnished as well. As Charles Krauthammer would say, Bush Derangement Syndrome claims another victim - NOW should have been a valuable ally in the cause of female freedom in the Islamic world.

NOW is now simply a pathetic excuse for a former advocacy group, just another bunch of heterophobic (heh-heh), anti-Bush whiners.

Adios MF,

Doug

Bush Never Met an Illegal He Couldn't Exploit

2007-03-16T06:41:00.000-07:00

President George W. Bush, master slaver, makes his usual ridiculous statements about illegal immigration. "I sent 6k troops on a bus tour of the desert (didn't let them out of the bus of course), so obviously I'm serious about securing our borders!" My ass. W's a damn sellout, just as bad as his legislative idol, Ted Kennedy:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070315-121050-6743r_page2.htm

All the good work that W has done in the WOT is tarnished by his abject surrender to Mexico and his slave-labor buddies on our southern border. Despite everything Bush done to take the fight to the Islamonazis, if I had to rate him I'd give him a 4 out of 10 as a President - ENTIRELY BECAUSE OF HIS LYING, BACK-STABBING, TREASONOUS BETRAYAL ON OUR BORDER SECURITY.

There is no question of the will of the people - 80% of the nation's legal citizens, including recent immigrants, want the wide-open border secured. So Tom Tancredo just sent me a solicitation for a campaign contribution, he's promising to run for Pres. in 2008 on a single plank - border security. Hey Republicans: What do you suppose Tom will do to your chances of getting another Republican President next year?

Bush not only has betrayed the people of the US on border security, he's betrayed the constitution he swore to protect and defend. Bush has doomed the Republicans to minority status and paved the way for, gasp, another liberal Democrat in the White House.

I've never bought into the hype about Bush's lack of intelligence, but I have to say: Nice work stupid. Enjoy your Mexican statues and Benedict Arnold legacy dumbass.

Adios MD,

Doug

The TRUTH About Israel and "Palestine"

2007-03-04T12:09:00.000-08:00

EXCELLENT article by Orson Scott Card about the REAL story of Israel. The murderous, lying, genocidal so-called Palestinians, the outrageous lies and betrayals by Muslim terrorists and nations, and the ongoing attempts by Muslim gangsters to keep milking the situation for personal wealth and power:

http://www.ornery.org/essays/warwatch/2007-02-18-1.html

Anyone who would prefer to know the TRUTH about the middle east conflict, anyone who ever had a shred of sympathy for the Arabs and muslims in the region (I DO sympathize with non-violent Muslims in the region, if there are any), and anyone whoever wished they REALLY knew what the conflict was about should read this. In short, the legacy media, the Arabs, the Muslims, EVERYONE has been lying about this for decades - to the point where the original facts and the TRUE history comes as a very shocking surprise to most.

All this agnostic, freedom loving American has to say is: Go Isreal! You can bet your ASS that no US politician will betray you for long.

My sentiments are echoed by everyone I know. They have nothing to do with any "Iraeli lobby", any 'Jewish control of major media' (that ALWAYS makes me laugh - our media is so anti-Isreal it's embarrassing), or any ulterior motive whatsover. My support for Israel has EVERYTHING TO DO WITH MY OPPOSITION TO BARBAROUS, MURDEROUS, MYSOGINISTIC, LYING, GENOCIDAL, RAPING GANGSTERS MASQUERADING AS HAMAS, AL FATAH, HEZBOLLAH, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND ALL THE REST OF THE COWARDLY SCUMBAGS - 'terrorist' is too nice term for them.

My support for Israel comes very naturally - the US has also at times been surrounded by enemies of freedom and democracy. We spent our blood and treasure to secure our way of life, Israel is doing the same - in the face of politically correct opposition from the rest of the world. Even from the US in some quarters - the ignorant, PC, molly-coddled generation makes me want to puke when they call themselves "American".

Keep up the good fight Israel, we're with you all the way. "Palestine" and "Palestinians" can kiss my ass, with their tongues out.

Adios MF,

Doug

Finally! Employers Indicted for Employing Illegals!

2007-02-23T11:43:00.000-08:00

Of course, it only seems they were indicted because they were also fraudulently collecting government benefits for the illegals. But it's a start:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/02/22/immigration.arrests/index.html

One down, 1,233,883 to go.

Adios MF,

- Doug

PS: Think I'll look into this company a little further - how much do you want to bet they were HUGE campaign contributors?

Rummy is a MUCH better man than YOU McStain!

2007-02-20T06:11:00.000-08:00

John McCain bashes Donald Rumsfeld as the worst DOD secretary ever - my ass. Rummy is one of the best ever DOD Secs; responsible for two of the quickest, least expensive (in terms of money and lives), and most one-sided victories in the history of the United States. That McCain is saying this in S. Carolina, a state with MANY military bases and families, is probably the worst campaign idea I've heard yet:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,252822,00.html

Unlike McCain, Rummy is a true American and staunch conservative Republican. McCain hasn't been a conservative, or even a patriotic American, since the early 90's when he joined with Hanoi John Kerry to shut down the Vietnam POW search. I know what Kerry's motivation was for that; his subsequent business deals with Vietnam netted him quite a tidy sum. Any money that Kerry can extort on his own ('Halp Us' Jon doesn't earn money, he extorts it) is that much he doesn't have to beg off the ketchup lady. But I AM curious as to what McCain got out of the deal...

McCain is doing his best to now to run to the right, wooing conservatives is apparently his main focus in life. Suddenly he's a big troop surge advocate, anti-abortion, anti-gay, etc. He's hoping conservatives will just forget about his betrayal on judicial nominations, his anti-free speech campaign finance reform, his support for amnesty for illegal aliens (I don't understand this at all - McCain is a senator from ARIZONA), and his half-assed support for President Bush and our military. McCain's certainly not helping himself in the latter area with this new attack on Rummy. McCain's not fit to shine Rummy's boots.

John, you can dissemble and pontificate all you want, we conservatives KNOW THAT YOU ARE NO CONSERVATIVE. You're a RINO and will NEVER GET OUR VOTE. You might as well just convert to the Democrat party, conservatives don't need any more 'help' from wishy-washy sell-outs like you.

GINGRICH/RUMSFELD IN 2008!

Adios MF,

Doug

Republican Traitors

2007-02-18T08:06:00.000-08:00

Below is the list of Republicans that voted with the Democrats in support of the anti-surge, non-binding resolution. UFB how stupid, traitorous, and ignorant many of our elected leaders are, but this vote helps to identify them at least; the so-called Republicans that is. To identify the rest of the ignoramuses, just look for the "D" next to their names.

The US expects more of Republicans than Democrats, everyone knows that congressional Democrats are traitors and self-serving, loathesome creatures. But to see this kind of behavior in Republicans is very disheartening. Obviously, these Republicans have sold out for their own imagined personal gain.

Guess what RINOs? This vote, more than anything else, will see you 'dis-elected' in '08, or '10.

Good riddance to quisling, ball-less liars:

Senate (The Spineless 7):

1 Norm Coleman MN (what a shame, all Norm's good work reforming the UN is now forgotten)
2 Susan Collins ME
3 Chuck Hagel NE
4 Gordon Smith OR
5 Olympia Snowe ME
6 Arlen Specter PA
7 John Warner VA

House of Reps (The Scumbag 17):

1 Michael Castle DE
2 Howard Coble NC
3 Thomas Davis VA
4 John Duncan TN
5 Philip English PA
6 Wayne Gilchrest MD
7 Bob Inglis SC
8 Timothy V. Johnson IL
9 Walter Jones NC
10 Ric Keller FL
11 Mark Steven Kirk IL
12 Steven LaTourette OH
13 Ron Paul TX
14 Thomas Petri WI
15 Jim Ramstad MN
16 Fred Upton MI
17 James Walsh NY

Adios MFs (and I DO mean Adios Mother Fuckers, in this case),

Doug

Not to be outdone, GOP's Inglis: "I surrender too Usama!"

2007-02-17T06:24:00.000-08:00

Rep. Inglis just betrayed every military man, every citizen, and especially all those Republicans who voted for him:

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/news/16719936.htm

Weak-kneed, fair-weather, cowardly GOP 'support' like this for the President, the WOT, our country's security, and our military is WHY we had that traitorous travesty of a vote in the House yesterday. Where in the HELL are the cohones that Rebpublicans used to be famous for? Ronald Reagan is SPINNING in his grave.

Inglis says, "I saw this vote as a vote of conscience, rather than a vote of representation. I consciously tried to disregard the political consequences." Since when does Inglis's conscience outweigh that of his constituents? What he really means is that he's a coward and doesn't have the stomach for tough fights. And/or, Bob Inglis is just a traitorous opportunist and looking for any reason to sell out his countrymen. Inglis might as well convert to the Democrat party and be done with it, he's clearly a Republican in name only.

My own Congressperson, Shelley Moore Capito, voted against the resolution, but then said in her newsletter "I agreed with it, but didn't want it to be used by Dems as a stepping stone to denying funds for our soldiers." I sent her an email asking her why she thinks her constituents want a dishonest, lying representative? I asked her, if she wants to surrender to the terrorists she should just come out and do so by voting her 'conscience'. I also told her, as I mentioned above, it's precisely her kind of mealy-mouthed, fence-sitting cowardice by supposedly GOP members that created the anti-surge resolution, and most of our problems in Iraq.

I further told Ms. Moore, and I'll say the same now to Mr. Inglis, that should Democrats and their traitorous GOP partners on this non-binding resolution have their way and force us out of Iraq, the death spree and further Islamofascist bloodshed that will then ensue will be squarely on their heads.

Just like Vietnam, the gutless politicians are well on their way to selling out American ideals, soldiers, US allies, and freedom for their own personal political gain.

Bob Inglis, you sir are a traitor, to this country, to your constituents, to the GOP, and most importantly to our soldiers. Your betrayal will not be forgotten and we true Americans will do our best to see you and your kind removed from power, forever.

Adios MF,

Doug

Pelosi, Hoyer: "We Surrender, Usama!"

2007-02-16T15:40:00.000-08:00

I'm so completely disgusted today by Democrat traitors it's hard to not lapse into profanity, but I'll try to keep it clean. Pelosi and Hoyer, and all Democrats (and ESPECIALLY Republicans) who voted for this non-binding travesty - I now feel even freer to question your patriotism (or, if you had ever demonstrated some I would question it):

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070216-033013-8887r.htm

Pelosi, lying leftie stooge that she is, claims that this is the 'will of the people'?! Says who, moron? Some polls? Todays polls are low on Bush because of the questions they use. Any poll on the Iraq war should include the question: "Are you upset with Bush's handling of the Iraq war BECAUSE HE HASN'T COMMITTED ENOUGH TROOPS AND SET THE ROEs PROPERLY TO KILL EVERY TERRORIST, IRANIAN/SYRIAN AGENT, AND INSURRECTIONIST IRAQI WHO POPS THEIR MURDERING HEAD OUT OF HOLE?" I promise you, this country would quickly get a vastly truer mass opinion than the current agenda-driving stuff media is reporting now.

The other thing that enrages me about this is Pelosi et al claiming that the '06 election was a referendum against the Iraq war, what rubbish! Democrats won elections because they ran on a platform of supporting the WOT, the President, and the Military. Democrats that could demonstrate any patriotism at all won elections. Those that were stridently anti-war lost - can anyone say Ned Lamont? Where does the Speaker and her leftist retards get their facts?

Even worse, Pelosi flagrantly brags about how this non-binding resolution against the troop surge (the surge that is already working great by the way) will lead to additional legislation to deny funding for the war, and the military in general. Then it really WILL be Vietnam all over again, the politicians betraying our soldiers and national ideals in their personal lust for power. Leftist scum of Pelosi's/Hoyer's age reliving their misspent youth. And I DO mean misspent - the 3 million people killed after the US withdrew from Vietnam are on the anti-war crowd's head. History will now place the millions of innocent Iraqis who will die after a US withdrawal, and the millions more emboldened terrorists will then kill, directly on the doorsteps of Pelosi, Hoyer, and all the US traitors who voted for this reprehensible legislation. This non-binding resolution is useful only to terrorists, and only hurts the United States.

The only silver lining in this vote is that the Democrats have done just about everything they need to in order to guarrantee a massive Republican surge in '08, and beyond. The Democrats, very clearly now the Party of Surrender to and Appeasement of Terror, will NEVER see the White House, and will lose all their majorities in the next election.

Pelosi, I spit on you and your traitorous ilk. You're even starting to LOOK like Hanoi Jane...

Adios MF,

Doug

And they wonder why everyone hates the French...

2007-02-15T05:59:00.000-08:00

Chirac is a Iranian tool, willing to have his entire country nuked by the mad mullahs:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/826179.html

Interesting that Chirac has no problem with the UN's French troops attacking Israel. I guess Chirac thinks the IDF won't kill the French pussies manning the Lebanese border? Better think again Jacques...

Or could it be that Chirac KNOWS that Hezbollah will kill Frenchies with NO provocation? What's tragicly ironic about the whole Lebanese/Israel/UN border watch thing is that the net effect is to give Hezbollah (Iranian) terrorists an ally against Israel.

Hey Jacques! You maroon, do you think your entire military stands a chance in hell if Israel decides that France (aka Wussistan) must be eliminated? The IDF will kill every French 'soldier' and raze Paris to the ground if 'threatened' by eurotrash in South Germany, er, France. Get real. Do you think the US will defend you against Israel? Bwahahahahahah! Do you think ANYONE will?

I'm a big fan of Gen. Norman Schwartzkopf's take on the French: "Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion."

The elimination of the Surrendering, Cowardly Nation of Betrayal (France) can't happen soon enough in my opinion - Israel can have a colony in what used to be the Islamic Rep. of Fwance. Gives the IDF better access to Iran, and once the Fwench wine industry has been 'kosherized', they might actually start making a profit in Champagne again...

Adios MF,

Doug

Joe Kennedy is a Sell Out Scumbag

2007-02-13T03:48:00.000-08:00

But selling out runs in the family, so it's not that big of a surprise. Joe Kennedy's pop sold the US out during WWII (when he could take time away from his other illegal business dealings). Joe Jr. is just following the family tradition by selling out to Fascist Hugo Chavez:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,251484,00.html

Joe asks "What are we supposed to do?" I'll tell him: Stop supporting America's enemies! If you'd like to subsidize fuel purchases for the poor, do it from MA's mammoth tax revenues, or from your own considerable wealth. Joe Kennedy is a traitor.

I applaud Rep. Connie Mack for his efforts to get Joe back from Chavez's propaganda team. Keep it up Connie; FDR had to slap down Joe Sr. - you get Junior. Use a bigger stick, and keep after the traitor.

PS: I'm back from my hiatus, more blogging on the way!

Adios MF,

Doug

Border Patrol: Arrested for Doing Their Jobs

2006-08-23T03:37:00.000-07:00

And for doing their jobs heroically in my view. My compliments to the two border patrol agents, and condolences that their fantastic work is now being punished. If anyone wonders whether our federal government is interested in securing our borders, please read this story:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060823-122228-3575r.htm

The answer is obviously "NO". This story makes me so livid I can't even think straight. Especially the fact that the DHS AG went into Mexico to offer this drug smuggler immunity, and then a basis for a 5 million dollar lawsuit. I wonder what would happen if the AG went after people who broke our laws in order to PROSECUTE them?

FIRE EVERYONE INVOLVED! REVERSE THIS RIDICULOUS DECISION!

Can you believe this horseshit?!

Adios MF,

Doug

Even Fox News Occasionally Needs a Reminder

2006-08-20T09:36:00.000-07:00

Below is my letter to Lis Wiehl of Fox News in response to her NYT-apologist drivel excusing the Times' (and seemingly, all journalists who betray secrets) betrayal of top secret government programs during war time.

I've become more and more alarmed lately with the leftward direction of Fox. With its kowtowing to major leftists like Hillary Clinton, Susan Estrich, and their shameful obeisiance to their part-owners, the Saudis, in PC-ing all discussions about Mulim terrorism, Fox is slowly morphing into a bastion of elitism like all the others. I know they are supposed to be 'fair and balanced', but does that mean they'll excuse treason? Only for journalists it seems:

Subject: NYT is a Treasonous Entity

(In response to your article on Foxnews.com: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209281,00.html)

As are you Lis, if you make excuses for media betrayal of your neighbors (like me). Today's media regularly and as a matter of course ignores the truth for its leftist, anti-Israel, anti-US agenda; it doesn't give a second thought to doctoring photos and using them as pro-terrorist supports, to ignoring the truth in favor of terrorist rendition of events. Today's media bends over backwards with moral ambiguity to allow killers of innocent women and children to obtain legitimacy. Now that the terrorists are poised to obtain nuclear weapons, you and like-minded media types will contribute to terrorist victory right up to the first nuclear holocaust on US or Israeli soil. Are you prepared to live with that Lis?

Our Muslim fanatic opponents hide behind women and children when fighting, targeting other women and children, so that any retaliation kills more innocents that can, with a complicit media, be blamed on the terrorist's opponents. Terrorists cut off the heads of innocent non-Muslims live on the web, they kidnap mothers so that their sons are forced to become suicide bombers, they gang-rape young women who have the temerity to walk out of their house without an escort, and they regularly use easily corrupted media types to promulgate their propaganda of hate and genocide. Modern reporters enable this despicable behavior by allowing it to succeed with their attacks on EVERYTHING we, the GOOD GUYS, are doing to stop it. This is why, with justifiable reasons, the entire western world distrusts and even despises the majority of media and their 'reporters'.

Articles such as yours that promote the NYT's bullshit excuses for their treason simply assist the media to continue their slander, lying, and betrayal of Americans and other freedom-loving people around the world. IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE IF OUR ENEMIES KNEW ABOUT THE WIRE-TAPPING AND FINANCIAL SNOOPING we are doing; telling them about it is treason. No question. In a former age when journalists cared about right and wrong, a newspaper revealing top-secret government programs during a time of war to the benefit of US enemies would be shuttered and its editors and reporters imprisoned.

Personally, I long for the days when traitors were taken out to the nearest wall and unceremoniously shot. Lis you obviously are missing the entire point of the war on terror - it's to ELIMINATE terror and terrorists! Those who would murder you, your children, your family, and everyone you know, combatant or not, to further their power-mad agendas. When you excuse the behavior of terrorist fronts like the NYT, you only lump yourself in with those who are part of the problem.

Name and address redacted.

Adios MF,

Doug

These Senators are Selling Out Your Children!

2006-08-10T10:52:00.000-07:00

ATTENTION ALL VOTERS! ATTENTION ALL VOTERS!

Below is a list of US Senators who voted for their shamnesty travesty, a bill that is UNIVERSALLY reviled in the electorates they claim to represent, and everywhere. Anyone who is concerned about the unchecked flood of illegal aliens across our borders, and who thought our elected leaders in the Senate will actually FIX the problem, need to take notice of these names. The Senate bill is a clear disaster for our country, and completely against the desires of everyone except the Senators and their campaign contributors.

All Senators who voted for this sell out - there just isn't any other word for it - MUST be defeated in their coming elections in '06 and '08. Anything that the 'esteemed' Democrat Senators from Mass., NY, Wisconsin, RI, MD, CA, and WA agree on MUST be bad for us all. The fact that McCain and Spector are for it on the Republican side is just as big an indicator!

The vast majority of the US is very much FOR the House bill that would seal our borders FIRST and foremost. Closing the border is step one, but eliminating the demand by enforcing our current immigration laws is also required if we want to do this the SMART way. Then we can decide what to do with the criminals who broke our laws coming here.

I post this list here and will be reposting it often in the hopes that it will assist others who wish to hold these Senators to their votes, their explanations ought to be interesting during the campaign.

Alaska: Stevens (R-AK)
Arizona: McCain (R-AZ)
Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Pryor (D-AR)
California: Boxer (D-CA), Feinstein (D-CA)
Colorado: Salazar (D-CO)
Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Lieberman (D-CT)
Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Carper (D-DE)
Florida: Martinez (R-FL)
Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Inouye (D-HI)
Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Obama (D-IL)
Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Lugar (R-IN)
Iowa: Harkin (D-IA)
Kansas: Brownback (R-KS)
Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA)
Maryland: Mikulski (D-MD), Sarbanes (D-MD)
Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Kerry (D-MA)
Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Stabenow (D-MI)
Montana: Baucus (D-MT)
Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE)
Nevada: Reid (D-NV)
New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Menendez (D-NJ)
New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM)
New York: Clinton (D-NY), Schumer (D-NY)
North Dakota: Dorgan (D-ND)
Ohio: DeWine (R-OH), Voinovich (R-OH)
Oregon: Wyden (D-OR)
Pennsylvania: Specter (R-PA)
Rhode Island: Chafee (R-RI), Reed (D-RI)
South Carolina: Graham (R-SC)
South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD)
Vermont: Jeffords (I-VT), Leahy (D-VT)
Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Murray (D-WA)
West Virginia: Rockefeller (D-WV), Not Voting
Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Kohl (D-WI)

Adios MF,

Doug

Chertoff: Border "Controlled" by 2008 - Yeah, right.

2006-07-28T07:30:00.000-07:00

So Chertoff expects Americans to wait another 18 months until our borders are secure?! At the rate illegals are pouring over our southern border, that translates to another 5 million illegals who are given the red carpet to invade our country:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060728-123022-6096r.htm

Chertoff is obviously only in his job to support W's sellout of US citizens via the President's 'Guest Worker' program. If the President and Congress were serious about securing our borders it could be done in 60 days. Instead they throw window dressing at the issue with 6000 National Guard troops (when 30,000 are needed), who they have to train for 10 weeks for a 2 week deployment, and who also are not allowed to actually help inderdict illegals. What a farce!

Bush and Chertoff also throw in a few prosecutions of illegal employers (when there are literally HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of employers hiring illegals), and 'almost' end catch-and-release. While I applaud even these half-assed efforts, that is NOT what we citizens pay our elected leaders and Department secretarys for. That is not what 90% OF AMERICANS ARE DEMANDING!

Our elected leaders obviously don't give a shit about US Citizens, the President and Congress only care about what illegal aliens can do for them and their financial and political aspirations. The ruling 'elite' are WAY out of touch with the electorate, the last time it was this bad we had an American Revolution. W and Congress are working for open borders, it's obvious.

We the people don't want to dissolve the United States of America George!!! We don't want to denigrate all the blood and treasure our forefathers and military have shed to establish the greatest country the world has ever seen.

Our political leaders, rather than solving the problem in the way that their bosses (us) demand, are spending all their time trying to maneuver a sellout that they hope we citizens will be forced to take if we want ANY progress on the worst domestic problem this country has. They spout the same lie over an over, expecting it to become truth at some point: "It is impossible to remove all the illegal aliens, we have to have a Guest Worker program and a path to citizenship." Which is why the Senate produced their Shamnesty Travesty in the face of overwhelming horror from the electorate.

BS! Our government doesn't WANT to deport the illegals; Fed. Govt. campaign contributors are paying big bucks to buy off Congress and the President. If we put a dozen men on the moon, and built the best and largest highway system in the world, and defeated the Soviet Union without firing a shot at them, we can remove illegal aliens from our country.

SECURE THE DAMN BORDER, WHATEVER IT TAKES. FIRST. FOREVER.

Then fine and/or jail all employers who knowingly employ illegals, and/or who fail to perform even the most basic checks. Fire all IRS and SS administration employees who refuse to cooperate with employers checking validity of new hires. This will eliminate the demand for illegals and relieve the pressure on the border defenses. Once we've stopped the flood of illegals over our borders, then we can take our time finding and removing all illegals in our country.

Send ALL illegals to the back of the line in their own countries. In fact, in my opinion, foreigners who obviously don't give a crap about US law should NEVER be allowed in this country again, ever.

The US House has the right idea with their proposal to secure the border FIRST and foremost. The President and the Senate are a disgrace on the issue of illegal immigration, and they will pay for it in terms of losing seats in the Senate, House, and probably even the Presidency.

I agree with the President on a lot of things, but George is quickly losing all of my respect just because of this issue alone. The Senate never had my respect, but now I'm even more disgusted and angry with them. In this blog and elsewhere I will be actively campaigning against ALL in the Senate who supported their Shamnesty sellout.

Adios MF,

Doug

The US Social Security Administration: Part of the Problem

2006-07-07T10:52:00.000-07:00

There's an excellent article in the Washington Times online today about the SSA's refusal to report false SSN filings to the employers:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060706-103244-4600r.htm

The SSA whines about privacy rights, but I smell a BIG RAT. Employers already have access to employee SS numbers due to other hiring requirements. Could this abdication of responsibility be because SSA, like politicians, doesn't care about illegal immigration because it's a boon to their personal interests?

Where does all the money that these illegals pay into the system go? Are you telling me that estimates of Social Security insolvency are actually worse when the illegal contributions are removed? Or worse, since illegal SS contributions seem a very easy candidate for it, are those contributions not even making it into the system? Fraud? Embezzlement? What's up with that SSA?

If there is going to be ANY progress on stopping the illegal invasion of this country, it has to START with enforcing the law against hiring illegals. You cannot enforce that law if our own government refuses to cooperate! Fire those responsible for SSA's policy of refusal to cooperate with our border protection initatives!

As much as Americans pay for SS protections, it's the least SSA can do to help. I'm a former computer programmer myself, we're talking about 2 hours worth of coding. Privacy has nothing to do with this, that dog won't hunt.

Adios MF,

Doug

Kelo: My home is my castle, I hope...

2006-06-24T07:27:00.000-07:00

The home-owner in the case that drove the US Supreme Court travesty about eminent domain is highlighted here in a Washington Times online editorial, very moving:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20060623-085056-8568r.htm

I wonder if any who supported this decision have ever taken an economics class, even if they obviously skipped US History 101? The SCOTUS might as well have just declared martial law and selected themselves as the new Politburo.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHY CONSERVATIVES HAVE BEEN PUSHING FOR STRICT CONSTRUCTIONISTS ON THE SCOTUS, ALWAYS. This is also exactly why our founding fathers CLEARLY forbade members of the Judicial Branch from making law, reserving that for 'we the people', in the form of our ELECTED representatives. Talk about a ruling that needs to be overturned, I can't think of any other more deserving, not even Roe v. Wade. Now every legislature in the country, city, county, and state is free to either pass laws protecting private property, or NOT.

The only bright spot in this whole tragedy? I love it that to immediately illustrate the true insanity of this decision, a few days after it was made a NH developer petitioned the local government to seize Justice Souter's family home in that state. In order to build a hotel, of course. Exquisite irony AND the reality of that SCOTUS decision! Bwahahahahah! And of course therefore downplayed heavily by our socialist media.

Please be assured Ms. Kelo, this country stands with you - forever. The US Constitution may be a 'living' document to some, but there is a long history of fighting to the death for one's valuable, honestly-earned, sacrificed-for, blood- and sweat-invested, legal possessions in this country, and everywhere in the history of the world for that matter.

Wiser heads are prevailing as we speak on the SCOTUS, and any legislative body who attempts to enforce this decision will be run out on a rail (one would hope). Even in the seedy, greedy, hands-in-every-pocket world of local politicians like those on Ms. Kelo's city council, time will eventually see them for the utter disgraces they are. Ms Kelo will be not only vindicated, but rewarded for her courage and perserverance. I know she probably wouldn't have chosen it for herself, most heroes don't, but the name "Susette Kelo" will now and forever be associated with being defiantly strong in the face of government tyranny.

Keep up the good fight Susette, this cannot stand.

Adios My Friend,

Doug

Rather was a victim of age discrimination...Bwahahaha!

2006-06-21T11:55:00.000-07:00

Below is my response to Ms. Estrich and views@foxnews.com to her column today about CBS letting Dan "The Forger" Rather go:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200345,00.html

I read Ms. Estrich's opinion column on Foxnews.com regarding CBS's poor treatment of Dan Rather. I laughed long and loud that she attributes Rather's fall to old age; I suppose a shallow woman of Ms. Estrich's age might prefer to think that as opposed to the truth. But while I believe that most of the US thinks that Dan Rather and CBS should have been brought up on federal election tampering charges for the Texas Natl. Guard debacle, that event was only the latest in a lifetime of serially biased reporting by Rather and CBS. Ms. Estrich can continue to deny the truth like the rest of the leftists in media, but the sad fact is that the majority of today's media practices biased yellow journalism as a rule, not an exception. "Rather Biased" has been a popular bumper sticker for decades.

CBS and its fellow harpies at CNN, NBC, ABC, the NYT, the WaPo, etc. steadily lose viewers/readers because they are hopelessly biased towards the left, this is only a quickly rejected "theory" among leftists - it's FACT to everyone else. Liberal media has long insulated themselves against the real, moderate, and even conservative leanings of the majority of the US in their attempts to push their liberal agenda. Dan Rather was the poster child of that leftist reporting, followed closely by Peter Jennings, but joined by 99 out of 100 people in the legacy media crowd.

Until the surge in popularity of the Internet, Fox News, and conservative talk radio, the average US citizen had no other option but to attempt to sift through the socialist agenda of available news sources for nuggets of truth. Ever since Cronkite's Tet Offensive propaganda (where good old 'trusted' Walter helped waste the lives of an additional 40k soldiers in Vietnam, and ultimately MILLIONS of innocent Vietnamese, through his agenda-driven reporting), and even before that when Ed Murrow took the teeth out of McCarthy's very important and accurate work weeding out the communist spies in our midst, the media has been in bed with anti-democratic, anti-American forces in our country. The passage of time and the demise of the Soviet Union have proven that McCarthy was stopped way too soon, before he was able to turn his attention to the communists in media and academia.

When there are no alternative news sources, ratings don't suffer. But where Americans can get both sides of the story, or at least the facts without the liberal agenda, they will come, in droves. With millions of potential new news viewers added every passing year, the sharp decline in viewership in legacy media ought to have been a HUGE wake-up call for media company owners. Instead, pundits whine about 'CBS age discrimination' that turns off viewers. Bwahahahahaha!

Personally, I'm a big fan of liberals keeping their heads in the sand about the fact that Americans are VERY aware of and DETEST their leftist leanings. The old media pulled out ALL the vile, underhanded stops in their efforts to get Kerry elected in 04 and Gore in 00. Their rage at their failure drives their continuing hatred of George Bush, moderates and conservatives, the American military, and our Iraqi coalition partners. The leftist media is doomed, and thank goodness for that. Ms. Estrich's efforts at dissembling aside, we the people will continue to ignore them in ever larger numbers.

Signature removed.

Adios MF,

Doug

Get With the Program W!

2006-06-19T08:45:00.000-07:00

Excellent advice from top conservative congressional leaders in todays Washington Times online:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060619-014021-3845r.htm

Republicans are growing more and more alarmed at unflinching poll numbers showing NO support for the Senate illegal amnesty and sell-out plan, and HUGE support for the House's 'border security first' approach. The words "guest worker" immediately generate a hostile reaction in any of the locales I frequent, W needs to get out of the White House more often to hear it. And "out of the White House" does not mean "into the boardrooms" W, take a walk down Pennsylvania Avenue once and simply ask passers-by.

Selling out the American people will not fly this time. The overwhelming disgusted reaction to the Senate bill should be a wake up call for all those who voted for it and support it: YOUR DAYS ARE NUMBERED IF YOU CONTINUE DOWN THIS PATH. In fact, it might be too late for you already, Senate votes have a way of following Senators around...

Wake up, wise up, listen up, and tighten our borders up! We will not be distracted with flag burning amendments, anti-gay marraige legislation, or even success in Iraq. This WILL NOT be NAFTA all over again; the Web will insure that a legislative sell-out of the American people will be immediately and forever labled just that, along with those who vote for it and support it.

Adios MF,

Doug

Delaware Green Party Candidate Michael Berg: Punk Bitch Extraordinaire

2006-06-08T08:08:00.000-07:00

Today the US Military killed Abu Musab al Zarqawi in an air-raid. This is the man, don't forget, who beheaded Michael Berg's son, Nicolas Berg, and posted the grisly video on the web. So what is Michael Berg's reaction? I'm completely disgusted, better read it yourself:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198680,00.html

Michael Berg: "...Zarqawi's death is likely to foster anti-American resentment among Al Qaeda members..."

Gee, do ya think so you pinhead? They sure loved us before, you think we spoiled their overwhelmingly positive attitude toward us by killing them?

Michael Berg: "First of all, I'm not even certain that al-Zarqawi even killed my son, ..."

Yeah, and Bin Laden is just a misunderstood holy man. Jeez, and Berg is actually on the Green Party's ticket in Delaware for the US Congress in the coming election. Are Greens REALLY THAT STUPID, IGNORANT, AND DESPERATE?

Michael Berg: "I think the news of the loss of any human being is a tragedy. I think al-Zarqawi's death is a double tragedy" he said. "His death will incite a new wave of revenge. George Bush and al-Zarqawi are two men who believe in revenge."

It's called WAR you putz, look it up in any dictionary. People die until the good guys win, no matter who starts it. We didn't start this war, but we ARE the good guys - we WILL end it in a US/Iraqi victory despite the reprehensible slime coming from men like Michael Berg. This man craps on the memory of his own son by eulogizing his son's killer, THIS is the anti-American left in a nutshell. Pro-terrorist, pro-tyranny, pro-criminal, anti-American, anti-Military, anti-freedom - as long as it helps them regain political power in the US, ANY TRAITOROUS, DISGUSTING, LOW-LIFE thing goes.

Berg and Sheehan, two self-centered, completely worthless parents in a pod - both ICONS of the American left, need I say more?

If this man actually wins the election in Delaware (not going to happen, Delaware natives aren't that stupid) I will have to boycott the state.

To Mr. Michael Berg: If you don't give a shit about justice for your son, if you don't care about freedom from tyranny and terrorism for 50 million people, if you'd rather that many more innocent people die in order for you to get elected, keep up the psychotic rhetoric you punk bitch. You son is turning over in his grave, and the entire country knows that you're the cause.

Adios MF,

Doug

Border Patrol Spying for Mexico

2006-05-09T05:51:00.000-07:00

This article from the The Daily Bulletin details an OUTRAGEOUS betrayal by the US Border Patrol of US citizens to a foreign government. The US Border Patrol is quietly informing the Mexican government of all Minuteman (and other citizen-based border watch) patrols:

http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_3799653

This is UFB: Legal US citizens excercising their constitiutional rights within the sovereign borders of their own country, doing the job our government in their vile corruption refuses to do, being put in danger by the very people we are supposed to rely on for protection. Instead, BP management and our elected leaders appear to be more interested in helping Mexico maintain the illegal invasion. By reporting Minutemen movements to the Mexican government, the BP is in effect providing every foreign drug and human smuggler target information on US civilians.

When the BP refused to give public credit to the Minutemen for the thousands of illegal alien apprehensions the MM facilitated with their reports, I thought okay, that's political BS and not a big deal. The BP rank and file know where their influx of reported sightings is coming from, and the public at large as well. But with the BP overtly passing information to the Mexican government on the movements of American citizens, to me, that's espionage. That's aiding and abetting a foreign government in efforts to break the laws of the United States. I'm THOROUGHLY disgusted, livid, and ready now for the coming 'reverse-insurrection' - the movement to prevent our government from abdicating the entire southern half of the US to the Mexicans.

The management and executive personnel of the BP and DHS who approved this policy MUST be brought up on charges and sent to a federal penitentiary.

Adios MF,

Doug

May 1st 2006: Counter-Boycott of Illegal-Hiring Companies Starts

2006-04-30T06:17:00.000-07:00

My friends over at the F.I.R.E. Coalition (http://www.firecoalition.com/index.shtml) have started a wonderful website to track businesses who knowingly hire illegal aliens. Illegals and their supporters are attempting to economically blackmail the very victims from whom they are stealing, tax-paying US citizens. They'd like to force us into just giving illegals what illegals are currently stealing, but I think we'll just pass that boycott incentive along to the employers who hire the illegals in the first place.

So effective May 1st I'm joining the millions of legal US citizens who will begin boycotting those companies who hire illegals. I encourage all my readers, and every legal United States citizen who feels our borders are not secure to join me - according to the latest polls that will be about 250 million of us. The interesting thing is, the majority of us are actually very pleased with the "Nothing Gringo" boycott, except that we wish it would include our land, property, public services, natural resources, and in fact, nation. Come back legally, and it's all good!

Starting May 1st when the illegals launch their Nothing Gringo farce, I and as many legal US citizens as I can convince will now go to F.I.R.E.'s website, "We Hire Aliens" at http://www.wehirealiens.com and check before buying.

We'll now - before spending our money - check on companies like WalMart, Sears, Burger King, Wendys, and MANY others who are knowingly hiring illegal aliens and thus selling out their very neighbors. We'll research outfits like Cargill before buying meat. We'll check Applebees before buying a beer after work, Best Western before renting a hotel, Target before getting a new jacket, and Merry Maids before hiring a cleaning service. All these companies are listed as knowlingly hiring illegals! I was going to go to Home Depot this afternoon to buy some mulch, but I think I'll start the boycott a day early and go to a local nursery who I know is clean instead - you can also check Patriot Companies on F.I.R.E.'s website, companies who ONLY hire legal citizens.

Talk about a backlash - the open borders and pro-illegal crowd can take credit for finally forcing legal citizens to wake up and smell the invasion. The foreign flags and talk of 'Aztlan' is just the thing to make a United States citizen reach for his rifle, where before we were content to just use our voices and votes. Congress and the White House have taken notice, no one can miss the panic as our elected officials realize that like with voting against going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq, to vote for any form of amnesty and/or against securing our borders is to kiss their political futures goodbye.

I hear that California's senate has endorsed the illegals' racist "Nothing Gringo" boycott on May 1st, I wonder if they'll endorse our permanent one, "Nothing Illegal"? :>D

Adios MF,

Doug

Illegals Out, Borders Tight, No Guest Workers

2006-04-03T11:51:00.000-07:00

I haven't posted in a while, between the job and the bands there isn't much time leftover lately. But today's article in The Washington Times on-line is as good a place as any to start on this topic of illegal immigration, if you've read my postings you know it's obviously one of my major concerns:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060403-125600-6207r.htm

The immigration 'debate' is nothing of the sort, the politicians just want to pull another sell-out over the eyes of legal US citizens. Let me be clear: WE DON'T REWARD POLITICIANS WITH RE-ELECTION WHO REWARD ILLEGALS WITH GUEST WORKERS PASSES, RIGHTS, OR CITIZENSHIP. The Republicans who vote for any form of amnesty, guest worker program, industry exemption, etc. can kiss their careers goodbye, as well as ALL Republican majorities for the foreseeable future. Conservatives will form their own party and splinter the GOP, that's how serious we are about this.

Conservatives pick their battles wisely and with conviction, I personally have two items that I'm not willing to budge on: Illegal immigration and strict constructionists on the Supreme Court. We got two very good judges on the SC from W, nice job there.

But if George thinks that we'll sit still for more of the same illegal alien and Hispanic pandering at the cost of American security, tax dollars, and citizens, he really is out of touch like the liberals have always said. I hate to say that about a man I otherwise admire, but this is just not negotiable for me - illegals out, borders tight. What is SO hard to understand about that, what is to disagree with? A good man, but W HAS been wrong before (Harriet Myers).

Here's a message to Bush and Congress since they haven't heard it the preceeding 5 million times: WE DON'T NEED TO CHANGE THE LAW, JUST MANDATE AND FUND EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT! NO GUEST WORKERS, FUND IMPROVEMENTS IN THE GREEN CARD SYSTEM! BUILD A WALL WHERE IT MAKES SENSE, WATCH THE REST WITH HIGH-TECH GEAR, INCLUDING UNDERGROUND! END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP. END 'CATCH-AND-RELEASE'!

Like with Harriet Myers, we conservatives are not kidding about this - just ask our new heroes, The Minutemen.

Adios MF,

Doug

UN: Close Gitmo before someone thinks of sending us there...

2006-02-13T06:41:00.000-08:00

NEWSFLASH: The UN Human Rights Council, UNHRC, that noted bastion of truth and freedom containing members such as Sudan, China, and Zimbabwe, advises that Gitmo be closed and that military and political leaders be prosecuted for torture:

http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20060212-113939-7219r

That link requires a membership to read the full article, but it's free.

The US knew what the UNHRC outcome would be as soon as they announced their investigation; it comes as no surprise that the UNHRC remains as corrupt as can be. Zimbabwe and Sudan probably did the first draft, they're especially good at fabricating lies in their own countries. The UNHRC never even visited Gitmo, they seem to have taken all their information from released terrorists. Wouldn't be surprised to find out they paid terrorists for some juicy lies, or guidance on which lies would do the most damage. Perhaps they'd like to see the place closed before someone in the US decides that UNHRC support for terrorists qualifies them for free lifetime membership at Club Gitmo?

As the article states, the UNHRC report on Gitmo is very symbolic of what is wrong with the UN today: It has become a haven and foil for terrorist, communist, and despotic nations. The UN today serves only as a cash cow for nations opposed to western culture, the US, democracy, and individual freedom. The UN today protects the nations that enable WMD proliferation, terrorism, socialism/communism, and who participate in all manner of corrupt and criminal activity.

You name the UN program, and I'll provide at least 2 links each to stories outlining the outrageous and despicable corruption associated with it. Oil for Food alone is worth abolishing the entire UN organization, starting with the conviction and execution of Kofi "Crime Boss" Annan himself. The UN activity in Congo, inactivity in Sudan, willful blindness regarding nuclear proliferation, and support for Palestinian terror are also in and of themselves justification for disbanding that entire cesspool in Turtle Bay.

This is what the free world gets for dealing in good faith with criminal nations. The US needs to go their own way, forming regional and like-minded coalitions such as those for Afghanistan and Iraq when it becomes necessary to act. Or, we should just go it alone as needed - no one gives us credit for any diplomatic success anyway.

The UNHRC is right up there with the UN Procurement Office in terms of corruption and stupidity, neck-and-neck with the UN WMD inspection team and the UN Security Council in terms of anti-US efforts. The bottom line is that the UN is too far gone to reform, those in charge will never allow it. Any efforts along those lines will be painted as US hegemonic activities and/or propaganda.

Consequently, the following (something I've been saying for YEARS) is becoming a louder, and more insistent mantra among sentient Americans:

US OUT OF UN, UN OUT OF US!

The sooner the better.

Adios MF,

Doug

Barking Moonbat of the Month - January 2006

2006-01-25T12:42:00.000-08:00

The final votes are in for the month of January, 2006 (of course all the votes are made by me, so it was easy to count)!

Al Gore almost stole the show with his anti-Bush tirade a week ago, Unhinged Al gets an honorable mention in this month's Barking Moonbat of the Month competition. Having Al accuse the President of 'knowingly, willingly, repeatedly' breaking the law would have been enough to take the prize if Gore wasn't such a pathetic loser. It's hard to give someone our prestigious award when the only justification for it is such a transparent cry for attention. Someone needs to hug the ex-VP quick - Tipper must be having an affair.

Our actual award winner this month worked HARD for the honor, even to the point of willful stupidity in "misinterpreting" the Concerned Alumni of Princeton satire piece into a racist rant. His accusations against an honorable 15-year judicial veteran of the US 3rd Circuit Court and legal scholar were mean-spirited, vicious, insensitive, and repugnant. Add to this our winner's befuddled, alchohol-ravaged, meandering and pointless delivery, and the award committee was overwhelmed.

The Sanity Anyone? Barking Moonbat of the Month award for this month goes to:

Ted Kennedy!

This month's award was really a no-brainer after Kennedy's performance in the Alito hearings - Kennedy is certfiable AND a major-league hypocrite. I laughed long and hard at his subsequent attempt to quietly withdraw from a male-only club of which he's been a member for 40 years. Kennedy's questions at the hearing were not only vicious smears and liberal propaganda, they were outright lies and personal attacks. This from the man of Chappaquidick infamy.

Kennedy needs to be medically retired, I can't believe the people of Massastan keep electing this numbskull.

Adios MF,

Doug

Iraqis Optimistic, Democrats Are Deeply Saddened

2006-01-24T16:03:00.000-08:00

I found a link to a Washington Times on-line article by UPI, regarding an international poll about national confidence. Afghans and Iraqis are most confident about their future among all nations polled, including the US, Europe, and Canada:

http://www.washtimes.com/upi/20060124-012008-3394r.htm

I couldn't find this anywhere on the usual liberal media sites, no surprise. I'm sure you will hear no Democrats mentioning this until they have to get re-elected - then suddenly they'll have been pro-military all along. They'll point to this success and be very proud of the vote to give W the authority to act in Afghanistan and Iraq. Gone will be any mention of Bush-Lied, No Al Queda/Saddam connection, Blood for Oil, NSA spying, Niger Yellowcake, Plame/Wilson, casualties, bad soldier morale, no progress, no training, lawlessness, and on and on.

The success of Bush's foreign policy glares around the world, and nay-saying Democrats, through their arrogant propaganda organs in the leftist media will now suddenly change their stripes.

Bush's recent performance in his public appearances is also seriously marginalizing the moonbats. His confident, forthright, easy demeanor wins many over with every folksy quip or grin. It's great to hear him, and ordinary folks reaction to him.

I loved the Iraqi/Kurd woman's plug for him and slam at the anti-war left during his Kansas State University appearance - fantastic! I'd link to a video of it, but I can't find it anymore on major sites. She managed to work in thanks for the President, a 'shut up' to his anti-war detractors, the fact that she lost 10 family members to Saddam's regime (and retrieving their bones out of mass graves), a big plug for Iraq's recent successful election, that two women in her family were now elected representatives, and that she spoke for Sunni, Kurd, and Christian members of her family. We need to hear a lot more of this.

But you won't. Democrats have their anti-Bush playbook and they're following it step by step. The playbook requires defeat in Iraq, terrorist attacks within the US and around the world, a weak economy, open borders, high crime, and strong enemies. It's methods include treason, betrayal, backstabbing, character assasination, smears, lies, and one-sided journalism. This is the DNC/Kennedy/Kerry/Gore/Moore/Soros wing, who by the way have the biggest man-purses.

But the Democratic playbook weakness is that it doesn't count on political whores like the Clintons. With Hillary moving right as fast as she can, look for fireworks with her honest liberal friends, supporters, and peers. She'll attempt the same "I'm a moderate by gosh, honestly!" approach that served her serial-philandering husband so well. It will be interesting to see which side the media takes in that fight - a greedy, self-interested hop into the Clinton sheets (as they always have), or the supposedly cleaner sheets of their liberal overlords?

In the end, she'll be the only seemingly electable Democrat in 2008. There will be an epic showdown in the DNC, and she'll get the cash. The liberals will be trapped with another liberal candidate who has to continue her moderate facade in a national election, a female Kerry. Add to that the extremely Republican-energizing quality of another Clinton candicacy (in particular Hitlery Rotten Klintoon herself), and the Democrats would get more votes running the dead body of Jimmah Cahtah for President of the United States in 2008.

Oh wait, he's still alive? Okay, Hillary would get more votes than a LIVE Jimmah, but no one else.

Adios MF,

Doug

RINO McCain: Leave My Free Speech Alone!

2006-01-16T18:08:00.000-08:00

In a typical slimy political move, RINO (Republican In Name Only) McCain tries to pull a fast one. The Abramoff issue being discussed is Senatorial and Congressional BRIBE-TAKING.

But McCain once again attempts to smother free political speech in every form except for politicians and major media through his McCain/Feingold farce, leveling outrageous charges against the Federal Election Commission:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060115-115028-4373r.htm

McCain sees the danger of average citizens keeping a close eye on their elected representatives through the freedom of the Internet and other alternative media. US citizens are clearly fed up with a lying, manipulated legacy media in CBS, NBC, ABC, NYT, WAPO, CNN, etc. - politicians have mastered the art of the sound byte. An alternative media that provides the REST of the story is anathema to a shady politician. And to a liberal media, for that matter.

I really regret that John McCain has fallen so far from his heroic past, it's a shame that today's military don't support him any more either. But his actions as an Arizona Senator have betrayed the very ideals our military protects. His 1991 betrayal of Vietnam POWs and MIAs and their families, in cahoots with another Vietnam 'hero', John Kerry, by killing US government efforts at recovery before we found our lost soldiers was just the start of McCain's slide into political whoring. His supposed 'campaign finance reform' is a joke, a shallow deception to consolidate electoral power in the hands of politicians and the major media.

Any mention of the Swift Boat Vets in a negative way gets my blood boiling as well. The article talks about the damage done to Hanoi John Kerry's presidential campaign by the Swifties, when in fact Kerry himself did the damage long ago by shamelessly lying about his military service. The article makes it seem like the Swifties did a bad thing, especially if you consider that MoveOn.org is also a 527. I'll put up with MoveOn if I have to, but they have to deal with groups like the Swift Vets too.

Kerry was a consumate liar, almost on par with the master Bill Clinton; but the Swift Vets came forward with the truth. The Swifties did an incredible service for their country once again, in the face of a hostile media and political climate, AGAIN, and with no regard for personal gain or loss, AGAIN. My hat is ever off to them, they buy no beer in my presence - forever. I cannot imagine 9/11 and a subsequent War on Terror under a Kerry presidency...we'd all be lining up to convert to Islam by now.

Only towards the end does McCain begin to address the problem, if only obliquely, with his 'earmarks' babble. "Duh, there's a built in problem with lobbyists having any access to legislators to address legislation specific to their clients." As solutions go, I guess regulated lobbyists and some good old fashioned INTEGRITY on the part of our elected officials is out of the question, according to McCain - need to do away with the earmarks.

So don't pass any laws, make any decisions John?

Or, maybe dump them all in a bill but don't tell anyone?

We all see your plan John: Make a big fuss without saying anything substantial. Change the names and methods of the way legislators are bought, put together a fancy sounding bill just like your 'Campaign Finance Fascism'. Shut down blog sites that might tell your constituents the truth about who you sell yourself to, and why. The legacy media will back you because it puts some teeth back in their liberal yaps.

Not on my watch RINO. We netizens will find a way around any bogus muzzle you put on our contitutional right to flame your corrupt, lying, power-mad ass in 'public' when you deserve it. Count on it.

Never forget: Despite what you and your homies in DC think, you ALL STILL WORK FOR US. Don't make us prove it to you again, our foreign enemies would take advantage of another American Revolution.

Adios MF,

Doug

Rafaello Pantucci - So Confused

2006-01-13T07:42:00.000-08:00

I read The Washington Times editorial by Mr. (I think he's a guy, although he doesn't display in his writing any testosterone whatsoever, just the opposite) Pantucci and couldn't help but think: Here's a man who doesn't understand the world we live in:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20060112-090214-1206r.htm

Europe is a socialist quagmire of stagnant economies, increasing Muslim demographics and fundamentalism, under the gun from an Iranian madman - and helpless to react with anything but moral equivalence platitudes. There have been two major, 9/11-style attacks by Muslim fundamentalists in Europe and Iran is about to have ballistic nuclear weapons, but Pantucci is arguing that Europeans won't support 'security at any cost', as if the US is taking pages out of the old Stalin or Mussolini models.

Pantucci , probably unwittingly, clearly represents the reasons for the slide into irrevalence of old Europe, as well as the reasons that Europe is such a ripe target for radical Islam. A socialist mindset combined with moral equivalence is a ticket to power for any group with balls, no scruples, and a willingness to get nasty. If Hitler was alive today, and if NATO wasn't around, Adolf could take the entire continent with one troop of Munich-area girl scouts.

Today Angela Merkel, Germany's new Chancellor, is in the US whining about Guantanomo Bay and secret prison camps after her government just freed a terrorist who brutally killed an American serviceman. The UK's parliament is rebelling against deportation for terrorist-supporting Imams, France is acquiescing to radical Muslim economic blackmail, and Spain - Spain is already the first Dhimmi-nation in the new Islamic Caliphate. All around the world, and especially in the US and Australia, Spaniards are running neck-and-neck with Frenchmen as the world's foremost girlie-men.

And Pantucci says that not only is the US wrong for standing up for western civilization, but that we should join the pantywaists of old Europe in their Dhimmitude. Silly Raffaelo, don't worry your pretty little head about it - we'll continue to protect the free, civilized world BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. We'll use whatever means is most effective in limiting risk to Americans and our soldiers, and not care a bit about the rights of proven terrorists and murderers.

Enjoy your last few years of freedom Europe, we won't be coming to save you this time - not unless you prove that you're willing to save yourselves. We don't waste our blood for fools and pussies.

Adios MF,

Doug

Barry Robbed by "Local Youth"

2006-01-04T12:13:00.000-08:00

Which of course is code for his drug dealer. The Washington Times online has a story with former DC Mayor for Life Marion Barry's version of the events:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20060104-121705-4974r.htm

I've got a 'translated' version of events for those of you who are not familiar with Barry BS like we locals.

Barry uses 'grocery carrying, odd jobs' as a cover for visits by the local drug dealers. Barry even admits that he's tight with them. "The bitch set me up" is a phrase that rings true for drug dealers too, not just crack smokers like Barry.
Barry obtains some weed/crack/blow/whatever from the local hoods, flashing a bit more money than he should.
Drug dealers then retire to the car, counting the total from all sales. Due to their own high usage, they're short for the next bulk purchase. Dealer A remembers the Barry wad.
Drug dealers return, rob Barry of money and drugs knowing he can't complain about the robbery for fear of the drugs coming up.
Barry knows he has to report this or he'll be a regular target in the hood. His "I don't want them prosecuted" is an olive branch to keep from getting shot.
Once they're caught, he'll stand up for LAW and ORDER, denying any drug accusations as a cheap tactic of the 'real' criminals.

Everything else in the Times article is window dressing. In DC's illegal drug business, Barry was a well-known customer, and yes 'hero' to them, for decades. That's why when they robbed him it "hurt him".

It's a CLEAR and amusing flashback to the heady 90s when the Mayor for Life (MFL) regularly used the DC police to clean up his messes, get hookers, get drugs, and squelch competition in favor of HIS drug dealers. The MFL was MFL.Inc! The money was pouring in from his crooked friends, the avelanche of prosecutions and jail sentences to come was only just being hinted. The DC Council and Fed. Govt. couldn't even get him on the phone, except by bugging his crack smoking trysts with his blackmailing girlfriends.

He's attempting to use the DC Police again as a council member, but for what I guess is a similar reason. I hope the robbers don't take it personally...Barry's a home boy, but he did call The Man...

Why do I hear that Mod Squad theme song?

Adios MF,

Doug

Democrats Filibuster While Terrorists Smile

2005-12-17T10:03:00.000-08:00

Terrorists can pretty much rely on Democrats and RINOs in congress, and even in State governments (Kaine in VA springs to mind), to give them ideas and assistance for their next 9/11-style attack:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20051217-123708-4670r.htm

FOUR YEARS after 9/11 and we still have loose borders, no profiling, poor baggage and cargo screening, and our elected 'leaders' are actually proposing to UNDO some of the things that have actually helped. What's wrong with this picture? Anyone?

I'm not for permanently expanded NSA and Patriot Act powers, at least some of the more intrusive (for US citizens) of them, but certainly another temporary extension of them is warranted. Why is this a question at all? With proper congressional oversight (if we can get them to quit leaking Top Secret information to the NYT and WaPo), I don't have a problem with this. It's a shame to say it, but under a Republican government, I'm more confident that the government can be temporarily trusted with this kind of power.

There have been NO instances of abuse of these powers, and these powers produce solid results:

Terrorists did not blow up the Brooklyn Bridge, or anything else since 9/11.
Terrorists cells were rounded up in more than 5 states in less than 2 years. I'm sure there are many others being eyed right now.
Intelligence about foreign contacts, planning, and tactical operations is gained.
The 'wall' between foreign and domestic intelligence is mitigated, controlled, and made more flexible.

We need to temporarily continue this approach, and more of it. We need to do it better, faster, and more creatively (yes RINO McCain, I mean more ruthlessly here - we haven't even publicly beheaded ONE person yet), and continue to do it responsibly. Terrorists HATE it, and opponents need to keep that in mind please, while responsibly considering our civil rights.

Adios MF,

Doug

Barking Moonbat of the Month - December 2005

2005-12-10T07:27:00.000-08:00

New SanityAnyone? regular feature: Barking Moonbat of the Month Award.

Sanity Anyone?'s December 2005 award goes to (drum roll):

The Nobel Prize Committee

Elbaradei, Arafat, Carter - The Nobel Peace Prize remains true to form

Mohammed ElBaradei is awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, a dubious honor these days:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,178327,00.html

This is the man who failed, over 3 YEARS, in the face of obvious Hussein trickery, to discover WMDs in Iraq. I could hide an 800 lb. gorrilla in my shorts and Mohammed would say I have unusually large testicles. ElBaradei, obviously in cahoots with Don Kofi and his corrupt Oil for Food machine, wouldn't disrupt the UN gravy train. If he actually 'FOUND' the WMDs ElBaradei and the United Nazis would be cut out of all the nice Saddam dollars, French kickbacks, Russian and German favors, and of course Chinese perks.

ElBaradei's getting the prize because he was sufficiently anti-Bush and anti-American, not because he was of any use at all in promoting or preserving peace. The Nobel Peace Prize, once the highest, most altruistic honor ever to be earned, is nothing to be proud of anymore. The NPP in the last few decades has evolved into an award for one who best promotes the Euro-centric, socialist, anti-freedom hegemony at the expense of the US, and pretty much everyone else if you're clever enough to see it.

They should call it the Nobel Putz Prize, much more fitting for rubes like ElBaradei.

Adios MF,

Doug

Democrats Cut and Run: 403 to 3!

2005-11-23T08:33:00.000-08:00

Democrats constantly suggest 'cutting and running' from Iraq, but thanks to some House Republicans with spine, had to 'cut and run' from their own 'cut and run' policies.

There. Have I managed to imprint 'Democrats cut and run' on you with my clever subliminal blogeration? For their continuing edification, Democrats should read and take to heart the comments of our military commanders regarding Congressional/media discussions about leaving Iraq, the conduct of the war, and congress's/media's role in demoralizing our fighting men and women:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20051123-122910-1566r.htm

Let me just repeat that vote, since the leftist media will lock this away into the 'never publish again' vault, along with the results of the US pull-out from Vietnam, the results of Communist and Socialist failure over their entire existence in the last century, and of course the positive results of Iraqi/Afghan liberation currently being actively suppressed:

403 to 3 against

any immediate retreat from Iraq

Where were so-called Democrat principles on this vote? Every one of them has called for retreat from Iraq, it's a great way to attack a Republican President. Especially since it's aided and abetted by a traitorous media at tremendous expense of their resources and time. But when it came time to go on record, to put their money (vote) where their mouth is, what do they do? CUT AND RUN like the cynical, self-involved, power-hungry liars that they are.

I wonder how the Democrats' leftist base feels about this squandered opportunity? Hey Cindy Meehan, Mikey Moore, Jimmah Carter, Martin Sheen, etc.! Your buds hosed you, how does that kool-aid taste now? Bwahahahahahah! Ouch, that's gotta sting. Better put some ice on that hippy! In the standard 'conservative football spiking' words of one of my favorite sites, FreeRepublic.com, "All your base are belong to us! Series! This is HUGH!"* /gloat mode off.

(*The original comments I believe came from liberal trolls on FR (before they were kicked off - 'zotted'), but were adopted for their obvious intrinsic intellectual content by long-time FReepers. They are used as a standard sarcastic riposte for trolls, for gloating, or as a response to overly-excited/rookie bloggers.)

Liberal politicians prove once again that they don't really believe their own principles and policies, and that they know average Americans overwhelmingly don't either. How else can this 403-3 vote be explained?

Adios MF,

Doug

PS: Did I mention how even Murtha himself voted against it? Oh, and by the way that total vote count was:

403 to 3 against

any immediate retreat from Iraq

(Democrats cut and run, democrats cut and run...)

****************
SanityAnyone.blogspot.com Thanksgiving 2005 Thanks To:

My kids, my family, and my friends. I am because of you.
Our honored military who bravely gave their lives for freedom, liberty, country, honor, and their fellow soldiers. We will miss you always.
Our honored military serving in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere around the world and at home.
Our honored military families, who bear the burdens of fear and uncertainty with pride and dignity. Our country is great because of soldiers and families like these.
Our Nation, may it be ever free and strong.
Our President, may he continue to show strength and resolve in the face of our enemies.
Conservative and moderate elected representatives who truly support small government, free markets, strong defense and foreign policy, strong economies, federalism, and strict interpretation of the Constitution.
My band, may it continue to rock the house.

Happy Thanksgiving to all!

Angus Young (of ACDC) is Number 1

2005-11-18T12:24:00.000-08:00

As he should be. The guitar's almost bigger than he is, but Angus plays it like a poet. A particularly nasty and smart-alec poet...:>D

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,176010,00.html

Riff Raff is my favorite, followed by just about everything else ACDC does. Rock on Angus, always!

Adios My Friend,

Doug

Unlike Frost, Tod Lindberg is obviously NOT lying...

2005-11-15T16:45:00.000-08:00

In this companion rant to my becoming-customary Frost Flame below, here's a perfect set of arguments from Tod Lindberg's editorial in today's Washington Times online:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20051114-102616-9711r.htm

In addition to Tod's arguments, I just have to ask one question:

Would you prefer a President, given HONESTLY the same evidence and situation, who would wait until we were attacked with WMDs instead of acting pre-emptively, unilaterally if necessary?

Democrats think we citizens have forgotten how much President Bush did to gain consensus, and build a coalition. And how successful he was despite outrageous Democrat and media sniping. We have NOT forgotten the 14 years we spent trying to keep Hussein from selling nukes to terrorists while the French, the Germans, the Russians, and the Chinese, aided and abetted by the UN via their Oil for Food program, secretly enlisted their expensive services in restoring Saddam's WMD ambitions.

To me, and I think most Americans, and even most citizens of the world in their hearts, Bush did the right thing even though it was personally and politically difficult for him. Bush had to act, act now, and on the best information he had at the time. Even though he wasn't sure, and even with the understanding that even the wise couldn't foresee all the consequences and risks.

So George W. Bush acted. That's what a man of courage and integrity does when his family, friends, and neighbors are in danger. Again, would ANYONE really want it any other way?

As I said below, I'm not religious, but I thank God, Jesus, Mary, Jehovah, Allah, Budda, Vishnu, Pele - WHOMEVER, that we did not have Al Gore for President on 9/11, or John Kerry at all. John Edwards, Gore, Dean, Kerry, Clinton, Kennedy - these men and women will lead only to defeat and socialism, and, increased terrorism if I even still need to say it.

W needs to wise up about illegal immigration and spending, but I will pray to anyone's God if it will help to elect more moderate conservative and pro-American men and women like George W. Bush to our governments.

Adios MF,

Doug

Martin Frost is lying again, his mouth is open

2005-11-15T07:53:00.000-08:00

Still not sure why Foxnews.com feels it necessary to consistenly give a platform to one of the biggest liberal Democrat spinners around, Martin "Lies-R-Us" Frost:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175554,00.html

After admitting that he himself voted for the war, Frost then whines about Democrats being vilified for now blaming the President for the same incomplete information that congressmen heard prior to the war. Frost is attempting to suddenly become anti-war, like all other Democrats seeing an opportunity to now switch hats and use it to harm the President and our troops. Democrats like Frost ARE damaging the war effort, they ARE lying 'fair-weather' patriots; W hit it right on the head with his remarks in Alaska. It's nice to see them squirming now, their 'the masses are ignorant and forgetful' scam exposed.

Frost then goes on to repeat the now thoroughly discredited DNC talking points about there being no WMDs, no imminent threat. Frost even seems to suggest that 250k Kurds WERE NOT gassed by Saddam Hussein. It's simply amazing to me that liberals and their 'useful idiots' in the media can so blatantly ignore bona-fide and established evidence to the contrary, and then think that average Americans will buy it! It's very insulting; guarranteed to push more folks over to the Republican party, mark my words.

Any unbiased review of the facts will show just the opposite of Democrat fairy tales: There WAS an imminent threat from terrorists acquiring WMDs from Saddam, Iraq DID attempt to buy uranium from Niger, there WERE several al-Queda training camps in Iraq, Saddam WAS producing chemical and biological weapons, and Saddam WAS planning to reconstitute his nuclear weapons program under the noses of the UN and the world, using profits scammed (willingly, in collusion with the UN) from the UN's Oil for Food program. Not to mention that Saddam WAS a tyrant busily killing off all dissent internally, and subverting the UN, the media, and other countries with bribes.

In addition, I still don't believe that what we actually found with regard to WMDs is all that Saddam had. Most likely, Saddam made a deal with Iran or Syria and they now possess the bulk of Iraq's WMD program. Bush would not want to divulge any knowledge about that so as not to tip off the Iranians or Syrians of possible plans to take action about it. The Democrats' insistance of working through the UN prior to the Iraqi war cost the US about 18 months in terms of putting an end to Saddam's regime - plenty of time to get rid of WMDs.

To continue to accuse Bush of making 'mistakes' with pre-war intelligence is to also admit that Democrats made the same mistakes, all their current whining aside. To continue to ignore the potential of NOT taking action against Saddam is treasonous, even now after Saddam is gone. I'm not religious, but I do thank God that W was President during 9/11, it seems Democrats would still be attempting to determine if Saddam is a threat when the Iraqi army rolls into DC. Unlike Senators and Congressmen, the President must take decisive action in defense of American citizens. If he's a principled American, he does not have the luxury of waiting to be attacked and hoping there's something left afterwards with which to fight back.

Bush DID make a mistake by allowing Democrats to hype this scam for years before fighting back with the truth. Now he's on the right track, clearly evidenced by Frost's frantic, puling, weak counter-attack. Expect to see more of this from Democrats as W ramps it up.

Liberals and Democrats are anti-US and anti-military, no question. You cannot support the troops by sniping at their mission and calling for their withdrawal before the job is done. Everyone knows - even liberals and Democrats - that to withdraw now, to even talk about it, is to hand victory to the terrorists. Therefore, when a Democrat conducts scams like this, accusing the President of lying to get us into a war, you know it's only a manifestation of their own personal dreams of politial power. Democrats will let ANY amount of innocent civilians, much less our valiant fighting men and women, die to once again achieve political power.

Frost and his ilk disgust me - 100 years ago such men and women would be jailed and executed for treason and subversion. Now, due to our socialist, terrorist-supporting, blood-thirsty media, they get front page headlines and an unimpeded podium to spew their lies.

Makes me long for the good old days...

Adios MF,

Doug

Outlaw Torture and only outlaws will torture...umm, wait a minute....

2005-11-11T22:27:00.000-08:00

I wish the pussies in our midst would shut up. When the other side sets the rules, they win. When we have so-called Americans helping the enemy by their subversive, anti-soldier, leftist BS, we lose:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175349,00.html

Veterans for Common Sense have none if they think torture doesn't produce results, reliable results. VCS is nothing but your usual leftist, anti-Bush assholes who happen to be joined by some of the 14 military folks (out of 1.2 million) who hate the President. I normally wouldn't even bother to honor them with a mention on my blog, but their comments were simply too blatantly ignorant to leave alone.

We simply don't torture our terrorist enemy enough, which of course plays right to their advantage. Terrorists don't have those qualms, and they think that anyone who does is weak and asking for more. VCS members claim to have served in the middle east and they don't know this? Where did they spend their time, in the latrine?

The only way to defeat terror is to defeat it in the minds of our enemy. Traitorous morons like VCS, the NYT, WaPo, CBS, CNN, and all the rest of the liberal media, along with delusional power-mad politicians like Kennedy, Kerry, Clinton (both), Reid, Dean, Schumer, Leahy, and the rest are no better than the scum we're fighting. Our enemy in Iraq and elsewhere kills children at school, and kidnaps them to force their fathers become suicide bombers. Our enemy poisons the minds of their fellow muslim children, shamelessly planting a lying, vicious hate, and condemning these boys to a short life of horror and blood.

If torturing ALL of them to DEATH manages to save one innocent Iraqi child, if it gets one soldier back home alive and intact to his family, then I say do it and screw anyone who doesn't like it. We're in a war, and the other side is cutting off heads on the web...

Damn to hell the bleeding hearts who care more for appearances, personal gain, and political power than they do about the lives of their fellow man, much less the men who fight to ensure our freedom. Cowards, traitors, and miserable vultures - how can any one of them say they support our soldiers while whining about methods that save military and civilian lives?!

I don't normally curse in my blog, but these folks deserve it as much as the terrorists do: Shut the fuck up get your candy-asses out of the way. Do that, and our military and Iraqis will finish the job twice as fast, with half as many lives spent. Grow up, get smart, get jobs, and join the rest of us in the real world, we're getting tired of paying for your fantasy world with our sons and our money.

Adios MF,

Doug

PS: While I'm cursing, and since I saw about 4 minutes of George Carlin's lastest cable stand-up act last night - right up until Commie Carlin said he doesn't "give a fuck" about American contractors getting killed while rebuilding and protecting Iraq:

FUCK YOU YOU WASHED-UP LENNY BRUCE WANNA-BE. YOU NEVER WERE FUNNY, YOU STILL AREN'T, AND YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T HAVE THE BRAINS TO EVER BE. GEORGIE, A WILDLY IGNORANT MAN OF YOUR AGE IS PITIFUL, BUT I'D STILL KICK YOUR ASS.

I'm torn, it might be fun to let Stephanides back in the UN...

2005-11-11T18:10:00.000-08:00

But don't expect it to happen - Capo tutti Capo Annan would never allow his patsy to come back. That would once again refocus the investigation on Annan himself, can't have that.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175270,00.html

I almost feel sorry for Stephanides, callously sacked 4 months before his retirement by the person ultimately (and maybe sooner) most responsibile for the Oil for Food scam of scams, Capo Annan. But don't cry for Joseph, Argentina - the reason for Stephanides' termination is plenty valid, and I'm certain is only a flake of snow on the tip of THAT particular iceberg. As much as I'd like to see Stephanides reinstated for the circus value, it's no guarrantee that Sen. Norm Coleman will be able to then crack Kofi and his band of thieves.

Norm will just have to find another way - leave Stephanides kicked to the curb where he belongs. Seeing Stephanides disgraced and unemployed is not enough punishment for the scumbag, whose participation in the wholesale selling of the United Nations to tyrants, terrorists, and soul-less corporations is without doubt. IMHO he needs to be arrested and shot for the damage he's done to Iraq, the US, the UN (yes, an honorable, pro-democracy, and pro-freedom UN would still be valuable, but don't hold your breath) and the world.

But Stephanides is, BY FAR, a little fish in this cesspool - Norm needs to find a way to use him for bait. We need to catch the true sharks involved, starting with Kofi "Oil for ANYTHING" Annan, and his crew.

Adios MF,

Doug

VA Republicans 'Get' Illegal Immigration, Dems Don't

2005-11-02T18:43:00.000-08:00

Finally, it appears that legislators are waking up to smell the semtex. Our borders are wide open to all terrorists, criminals, and subversives. Not to mention the economic catastrophe of illegal immigration. Excellent article in the Washington Times regarding new legislation (hopefully) coming in VA that will begin to address the 'demand' side of the illegal equation:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20051101-104932-6777r.htm

My son has lost two jobs due to shady employers hiring illegals for peanuts. Time to fight back Virginia!

Very interesting that Dems. whine about the positives of 'immigrants'. It's a typical liberal, pro-illegal dodge - no one is complaining about 'immigrants'. This nation was founded on immigration. What the vast majority of law-abiding, tax-paying citizens are complaining about is ILLEGAL immigration you Democrat putzes! Democrats are desparate to kill immigration reform - they want to make it legal for illegals to vote - these are the only votes they're likely to get with these policies.

Secure the borders, deport ALL illegals, and don't give me any of the 'guest worker' nonsense. Pay a decent wage and Americans will do ANY job.

Adios MF,

Doug

Border Security Bill: No Guest Workers, No Amnesty for Lawbreakers

2005-10-26T09:01:00.000-07:00

I wonder if our political leaders even care what their constituents think. NO ONE I know, and I know a lot of people, wants any kind of guest worker program or any form of leniency for illegal immigrants included in any new border security legislation. In fact, most folks I know simply want to enforce the laws we already have, and only want Congress to fund the necessary tools to do so. More agents, a border wall, more deportation, more technology, less beuracracy.

But no, this is what we get from Republicans to whom conservatives gave a big majority in both houses:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20051026-125749-7232r.htm

McCain is a simply a liberal in Republican clothes, I usually just try to ignore him. Hagel and Frist call themselves Republicans too, but are dangerously close to losing their base of support due to their inclusion of guest worker and/or legalization legislation in their bills. These men, aided and abetted by W's weakness on this issue, will destroy the Republican party with their soft illegal immigration stance. We are not amused.

Democrats will be able to lie, as is usual for them, about being 'tough on illegal immigrants' and unseat many Republicans, especially in border states. By the time the electorate realizes that the Democrats they elected are even more pro-illegal than the Republicans, it will be too late. I see a large number of recall elections in our future.

REPUBLICANS: Better get with the program, or your days are ALL numbered.

Until then, GO MINUTEMEN!!! I've recently become a proud volunteer, by the way...

Adios MF,

Doug

Galloway: Robbing Iraqi Children on Saddam's Payroll

2005-10-25T17:13:00.000-07:00

Soon-to-be-ex-British parliamentarian, nee-inmate Galloway, gets his comuppance.

Everyone knew, despite his 3rd-rate acting (in my personal opinion - because of it), that Galloway was as guilty as hell during his appearance before Congress earlier this year. The documentated proof of his guilt existed back then, if not the supporting witness testimony. It was mentioned in the press, but was not widely reported. Well, it's widely in the press now:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20051025-121942-5416r_page2.htm

After the Congressional meeting, where - by the way - a non-committal Senator Coleman calmly watched the intrepid Brit commit what we now find was perjury, the liberals touted Galloway as a hero. It was amusing to watch the liberal media gloat over Galloway's ameteur theatrics, portraying him as "fiesty", and "combative". Of course, you won't hear them using such appealing adjectives about him anymore, soon it'll be "defensive", "evasive", etc. And no mention, of course, of the Galloway/liberal media love fest of just a few months ago.

It's seems very clear now that Galloway was one of those on Saddam's payroll, tasked with turning at least British public opinion in the dictator's favor, and against the US. Paid with money that should have gone to feed Iraqi women and children, Galloway ranks among the worst of humanity, a putrid example of elitism, corruption, and hypocracy. The liberal, socialist ranks of the world are full of these men and women, people who will trade innocent lives and the freedom of others for their own wealth and power. This is in essence what creates Saddam Husseins, Josef Stalins, and Adolf Hitlers.

Freedom and democracy are what defeats men like these. A free Iraqi press in Galloway's case...

Signing off to Inmate Galloway now, and I DO mean "Adios" but NOT "My Friend":

Adios MF,

Doug

Go Minutemen!!!

2005-10-20T22:51:00.000-07:00

Excellent news from Herndon, VA, right around the corner from me:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro/20051020-105957-2582r.htm

It's about time that we ordinary citizens step up to the plate and put our pro-illegal governement and business community on notice: WE THE PEOPLE WILL NO LONGER TOLERATE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OR THEIR EMPLOYERS, OR THEIR POLITICAL BENEFACTORS WITHIN OUR GOVERNMENT.

Think I'll see if they need another volunteer.

Adios MF,

Doug

UN: Shell Games and Conspiracy Inc.

2005-10-20T21:31:00.000-07:00

More sewage leaking from the floating crap game in Turtle Bay:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,172902,00.html

What a convoluted mess. This is how the corporate pirates get in bed with the corrupt scum at the UN spending US tax money and hard-earned money from developing nations. It's very hard to follow, but I believe bottom line in this story is that a corrupt company got caught using a corrupt UN contact to obtain contracts through malfeasance. So they sell the company to themselves using corrupt offshore shell corporations in an attempt to continue doing business as usual.

This is also how the UN Oil for Food scandal worked. I hope that some day the world will find out the identify of all the criminals involved. The UN is such a hotbed of corruption, I've never seen anything like it. Makes the Mafia look like streetcorner card sharks.

Way to go Fox for staying on their trail and exposing the fraud! Keep it up.

US OUT OF UN, UN OUT OF US!!!

Adios MF,

Doug

Be my guest to work in your OWN country...

2005-10-19T07:45:00.000-07:00

Dear George,

How many times do we have to say it?! THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES (you know, the folks who ELECTED you) DO NOT WANT A GUEST WORKER PROGRAM. So what do you do? Bundle the guest worker crap in the same legislation with the border security reforms that we DO want:

http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20051019-121035-2494r

There ARE no jobs that Americans don't want to do. There are jobs that Americans won't do for the measly pay that your pals in the corrupt, money-gubbing, greedy industries that donate to your's and all politician's election campaigns offer - true. But eliminate the slave labor pool that illegal immigration provides and the economy will correct that injustice.

NAFTA, CAFTA, guest workers, and the other nonsensical legislation that are thinly veiled attempts to screw Americans out of a decent wage do not fool us anymore. We're TIRED of our elected leaders selling us out for campaign contributions.

So while you're at it securing our borders, how about some REAL campaign finance reform rather than the unconstitutional, anti-1st Amendment, claptrap in McCain/Fiengold?

I'm thoroughly disgusted with you on the issue of guest workers W, it's a betrayal of the first order to conservatives, and indeed to all working Americans. The United States DOES NOT NEED a legal sub-class of employees, who due to their circumstances will work for peanuts and no benefits. It will not stop at 'jobs Americans don't want to do', as if there are any. Pretty soon computer programming will be 'a job that Americans don't want to do', as will trash collection, and carpentry, and plumbing, and on and on. Also, I guarantee that liberals will immediately start agitating for voting rights, unions, and increased wages for these 'guests', it won't be a cheap labor pool for long!

The backlash from your guest worker program will fracture the Republican party, alienate conservatives, and destroy the ability of Americans to hope for smaller government, responsible government spending, and law and order. How can you do this to Americans George?! Have you no shame, no scruples, no compassion at all for your fellow Americans? If you were looking for another issue that will DESTROY your legacy of the man who spread democracy to the middle east, you found it in guest workers.

FIRST, secure our borders, without the guest worker nonsense please. SECOND, punish American companies who employ illegal aliens. THIRD, over the next few years remove EVERY SINGLE ILLEGAL ALIEN from my country.

It's getting to the point that I'm forgetting why we elected you George. It's all well and good to provide democracy to middle eastern folks, how about some for your own country?

Adios MF,

Doug

Victims exploited, entire categories of innocents condemned...

2005-10-16T20:13:00.000-07:00

Wendy McElroy is a terrific writer on many subjects, including women's issues and modern feminism. Her column on Foxnews.com is always a must read for me, and this one is no exception:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171951,00.html

She's so right about the folks that take advantage of the generous and caring nature of average Americans. I had a lot of sympathy for the Hurricane Katrina victims (most of them, it's hard to sympathize with looters of TVs and luxury items, and scum that shot at rescue workers), and was fully prepared to make a donation of money to the cause. But as soon as the 'victimization' crowd stepped in; the NAACP, Nagin, Blanco and the race baiting Sharpton, Farrukahn, and Maxine Waters my sympathy evaporated, and my money is staying home.

The backlash against these folks who DEMAND legislation and reparations for entire classes of people, at the expense of entire classes of people, is considerable. I'm a perfect example. The Farrukahns who make completely outrageous, racial accusations without the slightest hint of proof, and the scumbags who refuse to disassociate themselves with it, much less refute it, disgust me. These bastards are killing human decency in our country, and I'm sad to see it go.

Of course it doesn't help that Blanco, Nagin and the other fantastically corrupt New Orleans and Louisiana Democrats are taking the opportunity to capitalize on the goodness of our federal government and donating citizens by tacking on every bit of pork they can find to their DEMANDED hurricane 'aid'. I'm even more disgusted by these losers than I am with Farrakahn and Sharpton - everyone knows Louis and Al are racist lunatics.

But these Democrats are the people that NO and LA elected. Seems to me that residents are getting what they deserve from the scumbags. But you can bet your ass that I'm going to do my best from now on to point out their corruption and opportunism. I'm tired of paying for the greed of politicians, aren't you?

I'm VERY tired, and SERVERELY PISSED OFF.

Adios MF,

Doug

Give the Internet to the UN?!

2005-10-13T19:02:00.000-07:00

NOT A CHANCE!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,172184,00.html

We built it, we'll keep it. Jimmah Cahtah is no longer president (thank God), and the Net will not be another Panama Canal.

All the other whiner countries can pound sand. It's very interesting that our "allies" in the European Union have joined with our enemies in China, Iran, and Cuba to demand we turn over the management of the Net to the UN. Not that any American is surprised at the turncoat bastards.

They are very welcome to create their own "World Wide Webs" - an empty threat if I ever heard one. That's like North Dakota deciding to build their own national highway system. Good luck, and we'll just stay on the US WWW with the rest of the world, thank you.

You might as well just shut it down if you're going to turn it over to the UN. Websites will cost 5000 times as much, and US and Israeli sites will be down more than up. All evidence of the Holocaust will disappear from sites, and top secret US defense intelligence will be 'mistakenly' published on a regular basis.

The Net is ours, deal with it.

Adios MF,

Doug

Down with Dotster!!!

2005-10-10T15:49:00.000-07:00

Just in case anyone who reads this blog is considering creating a website using Dotster.com, DON'T. They are criminal scum!!

Back in January I created a band website using their service. Unfortunately, the band broke up in Feb. But Dotster sold my personal information, without my permission of course, to as many hucksters and direct mailing firms as they could find. Not a day goes by that my mailbox isn't clogged with direct mail trash addressed to me at the old band's name. I get spam addressed to me in the same manner.

I've complained to them about it, but of course it's too late now. Also of course, Dotster never replied to my complaint.

They had the nerve recently to ask me to renew my website as it is set to expire soon. You can guess the tone of my reply...I'm sure they don't give a crap tho.

Adios MF,

Doug

Build a Border Wall

2005-10-10T15:28:00.000-07:00

Absolutely, build a wall on our southern border, but don't compare it to the Berlin wall. The Berlin wall was designed to keep people in, not out.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171668,00.html

The southern US border is as porous as 50 year old fishing net. My favorite part of the article is the comment by the pro-illegal Ms. Sanbrano:

"I think what we're doing is criminalizing work and criminalizing the need of families to be together," said Angela Sanbrano of the (organization deleted, not promoting a criminal-supporting organization on my blog) an open-borders interest group."

That's such crock of BS I don't know where to start. Mexicans can work and their families can be together just fine on THEIR OWN side of the wall. Any who are here illegally will just have to go home, the US Govt. will even help them with a little deportation bus ride. Ms. Sanbrano needs to wake up and smell the Semtex - the US is wide open to terrorists through our porous borders. Not to mention the economic catastrophy of illegal immigration - I'm through being Mexico's number one financial benefactor.

Let's build the wall, and then we can refocus our limited Border Patrol resources on our northern border, almost as bad.

And by the way, until we can get the wall built - GO MINUTEMEN!!!!

Adios MF,

Doug

A Byrd in the hand craps all over West Virginia

2005-09-27T11:22:00.000-07:00

Please say it isn't so! Eighty-seven year old WV Senator Byrd announced he plans to run for re-election again:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170557,00.html

The the anti-American, former KKK honcho continues to BS West Virginians, applying his considerable clout to rig WV US Senatorial elections over and over. This man is SCUM, and I can't believe honest West Virginians continue to support this liberal fruitcake. My feeling is that he owns the Democrat machine in WV, which extends to the vote counters - I bet he subsribes to the Tammany Hall credo: Votes don't decide elections, counters do.

I will vote for Capito, or any Republican that challenges this nut job. I will also do my best to campaign against him via word of mouth and here on my blog. Byrd is second only to Ted Kennedy on the leftist moonbat fringe of the Democratic Party.

West Virginia needs new, pro-American, pro-Democracy, pro-free market, anti-union ideas to bring it into the 21st century. WV can very closely compete with any state in the union for jobs, businesses, and productivity, but not while Big-government-Byrd is our representative in the US Senate. Byrd has been spending more than West Virginia earns for DECADES, he's a leading champion of sky-high national debts, intrusive government regulations, and anti-American rhetoric. Let's FIRE this communist come our next election!

Adios MF,

Doug

Memorializing Terrorists in America

2005-09-12T05:23:00.000-07:00

Every time I hear about memorials for September 11th victims I get madder and madder. Who the HELL hijacked these memorials in order to have them honor the terrorists rather than the victims, as in Pennsylvania:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168982,00.html

A red crescent of maples?!! Are you kidding?! Tell me this is a simply an under-educated artist's error... If this goes forward I wonder if Vegas will lay odds on it being BURNED TO THE GROUND before it grows...

Or, in NYC, turning the Memorial Museum into a leftist terrorist-justifying, hate-America, 'we're to blame' political farce.

http://uncooperativeblogger.com/2005/07/27/911-memorial-under-attack/

I can tell you who hijacked them - the same leftist rabble that attempts to destroy the US at every turn: George Soros, MoveOn.Org, Michael Moore, the NYT and all leftist press/media, leftist academia, and rest of the traitorous scum calling themselves liberals, or progressives, or largely, even Democrats.

Let's take our memorials back and send a message to the left:

YOU DON'T SPEAK FOR ANYONE IN THIS COUNTRY WHO ACTUALLY CARES ABOUT IT. FUCK OFF!

(That's right, for the first time on my blog I said a curse word - they've earned it.)

Here's a link to a petition to stop this madness - SIGN IT:

http://takebackthememorial.com/petition/

Adios MF,

Doug

Martin Frost at it again - Vulture Politics

2005-09-02T18:47:00.000-07:00

You expect leftist partisans like Martin Frost to take potshots at President Bush, but not over the dead bodies of American citizens in Louisiana and Mississippi. We haven't even been able to get to the dead bodies in order to find them, we haven't even been able to stop the levies from leaking and this scumbag is already taking shots at the Republicans:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168368,00.html

Democrats like Frost simply have no shame, no morality in their thirst for power. Not only will they abandon entire nations to tyranny and oppression if it will help their political chances, but they have no qualms about dead Americans in that respect either if it gets them elected. I'm throroughly disgusted with liberals like Martin - and they wonder why they are steadily being rejected by normal citizens. Americans will pull together first in order to save lives and limit damage, leftists like Mr. Frost prefer to skulk on the sidelines in DC and in their home states, taking jabs at a President currently too preoccupied to respond.

Mr. Frost: STFU! Your behavior is just like the common vulture - when it's safe fly in and strip the flesh from the no longer resisting bodies. Hang around the carnage and wait for your chance to peck the eyes out of a distracted Administration. It's understandable in a vulture, it's only abhorrant behavior in a human being. But liberals stopped being human long ago - it doesn't put butts in the House or Senate.

This is my third post about Mr. Frost, he makes me even sicker than normal with his current batch of weasle-droppings that Fox News chooses for some reason to post to their website. I don't understand Fox at all - Frost's vitriol is not only not news, it's not even intelligent commentary - ever. Fox is really breginning to worry me - they chose to downplay the "You Don't Speak for Me Cindy!" tour, and a number of other pro-American responses to the negative avalanche from the liberal press on the Iraq war.

And they continue to post Mr. Frost's ravings like they made any sense whatsoever. What's up with that Fox?

Adios MF,

Doug

Let's see how the liberal media ignores Clinton's failings this time...

2005-08-18T10:59:00.000-07:00

You know they will, or find someone else to blame it on:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166004,00.html

All of this information was available from day 1 to the media, but they ignored it. They refuse to believe that they and their liberal 'god' Clinton could have been so clueless about the growing threat of terrorism.

My favorite part of the the above article is Lt. Col. Buzz Patterson's comment about how Clinton met with Monica Lewinsky more often that his CIA and FBI directors. Ha! So true, so funny, but overall, OUTRAGEOUS! Where is the outrage in the media about this?!

Reno and Gorelick are, of all Clinton Administration officials after Clinton and Berger themselves, most responsible for the tragedies of 9/11/01. Clinton was not wise enough to be President of the US; too immature and of low character. But his sycophantic cabinet, lawyers, and advisors were more concerned with liberal ideology and job preservation than national security, it's obvious. The 9/11 attacks were the result of 8 years of Democrat negligence of national security in favor of Clinton's penis. The 9/11 Commission was almost entirely geared to protecting Clinton's legacy, it's good to see that scam coming unraveled now.

It disgusts me that liberals and Democrats refuse to come to grips with their ideological failings and the bloodshed they cause. Even today in Israel, reporters can scarcely contain their glee watching the anguish of Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. Israeli conservatives are meeting terrorists half-way at great cost to themselves and innocents, but all the liberal reporters can do is gloat and and exploit the pain.

Let's see what they say when terrorists resume killing Israelis anyway after this withdrawal.

Adios MF,

Doug

Cindy Sheehan's "Grief"

2005-08-15T23:05:00.000-07:00

Can't say I blame her husband for wanting a divorce:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,165811,00.html

But in fairness, I don't know why her husband wants one. If it was me, I'd want one for disgracing my son's sacrifice and dishonoring his memory.

Ms. Sheehan's sacrifice is too terrible for me to contemplate, but certainly no greater than a thousand other mothers. It's very duplicitous of her to demand a meeting with President Bush when after her last meeting with him she complimented his sincere concern and offer of condolences. Ms. Sheehan has either willingly or unwittingly become a stooge of the anti-war crackpots who would prefer to continue to sacrifice innocent lives to tyrants and terrorists. It's looking more and more like 'willingly' to me. 'Grief-stricken' only explains so much.

Ms. Sheehan now claims that her first meeting with the President in June 2004 was before "reports surfaced of of faulty pre-war intelligence"? Clearly, a ploy to align her pain with the plethora of anti-war loonies. Not even a good lie to crassly manipulate her 'loss' into her 15 minutes of fame and to explain her 'change of heart' - in full knowledge of her almost immunity to critique.

So Ms. Sheehan demands that all troops should be brought home now, completely abandoning the cause for which her son gave his life. I wonder how her son would have felt about her actions? Even if he felt the same, I wonder if he'd have wanted his mother to dishonor his fellow soldiers and friends?

I could be wrong about Cindy Sheehan, but that's how it looks to me. While I can understand most reactions to such an overwhelming loss, I cannot understand manipulating it for a personal agenda. In fact, I'm fairly revolted by the idea, and I bet W is too.

Adios MF,

Doug

911 Commission Democratic Scam Exposed

2005-08-15T07:18:00.000-07:00

As I blogged last year, so it seems to be happening now. Last year I posited that the Clinton Administration had the 'fix' in on the 911 Commission from the beginning. My observations led me to believe that Slick Willie and his harpy wife scammed and threatened everyone and their brother in order to stack the commission in their favor. With the new revelations coming from the DOD's Able Danger intelligence group, the fascade has been torn for all those who wish to see - the truth is imminent:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,165594,00.html

The Clinton Administration worked very hard through their operatives on the Commission, Gorelick and Ben Veniste, and their behind the scenes 'Bergler' - Ole Underpants Stuffer Sandy Berger, to squelch any idea that the US was aware of the 911 murderers before Bush was elected. The Able Danger information confirms that the US military was aware of Mohammed Atta in 1998, and that Atta was planning a major US attack. Combined with the ignored evidence of Atta's visit with Iraqi Intelligence in 1999, the Clinton scam begins to unravel.

As I suspected from the beginning, and the Able Danger information begins to prove, the Clinton Administration was well-aware of the danger posed by Atta and his cronies well before the 911 attacks. They were also well-aware of the potential involvement of Saddam Hussein's Iraq in supporting and funding these terrorists. But due to Democrats desire to attack the President and deflect blame from themselves and their poster boy Clinton, a clever but short-sighted scam emerged.

It seems obvious to me that ALL of President Bush's reasons for attacking Iraq have been validated to a level that gave W no choice. Plenty of evidence of WMD production has been found, despite Democrat 'head in the sand' reactions of 'No WMDs!!'. Very suspicious connections between the 911 murderers and Saddam Hussein's Iraq - not to mentoin the Al Queda TRAINING CAMP by Mosul - have virtually proved that Saddam was involved in this attack on the US in one way or another. The fact that Saddam's Intelligence Service was trained by the KGB also leads me to believe this - the KGB pioneered the idea of using terrorists as cut-outs to attack Soviet enemies.

But Clinton's 911 Commission scam was clever: Jamie Gorelick was installed on the Commission to defend the Democrats against obvious abdication of responsibility and dereliction of duty. Gorelick herself should have spent the entire time in the witness chair rather than on the Commission, explaining to the American people why the Clinton Administration policy that she authored - no coordination between military and civil intelligence with regard to terrorism - was put in place. Democrats avoided having to explain why their 'terrorists as criminals' and 'politically correct treatment of murderers' mindset was a primary cause for the 911 intelligence failure. Gorelick managed the Commission from inside, carefully misdirecting the investigation any time it got too close to the truth - Democrats virtually invited the 911 attacks through their ignorance and personal agendas.

The second part of the Clinton 911 Scam involved ensuring that the Bush Administration would be the target for as much blame as possible. This is where Richard Ben Vineste came in. Ben Veniste is an old cohort of Hillary "Taking From You for the Common Good" Clinton, and was installed on the Commission to be the attack dog. If anyone watched Ben Vineste ask a question of a Bush Administration staffer, I won't have to explain the strategy. Standard partisan-press tactics - make a damning speech for 30 minutes; ask a rhetorical question and then answer it yourself; spew misleading and unsubstantiated rumor; and make personal attacks in hopes to make the questionee look defensive. I have no idea where Republicans were during the drafting of the Commission participants, but the fact that they would allow a liberal, slimey lawyer on the Commission is, in my view, futher evidence of the behind-the-scenes power playing of the Clinton and Democratic operatives.

I loved Condi Rice's reaction to Ben Veniste's questioning; "Would you please let ME answer one of the questions you're asking me?"

The other large part of the conspiracy was Sandy Berger's role in managing the Clinton Administration evidence being requested by the Commission. Berger was tasked to hide any incriminating evidence of malfeasance and idiocy on the part of the Democrats and Clinton. NO ONE believes that Sandy 'Bergler' MISTAKENLY stuffed documents into his pants, socks, brief case, pockets, etc. Please! Sandy was caught in a flagrant violation of security laws, as a former National Security Advisor there is NO WAY he can float a 'sorry, I made a mistake' defense.

But that's exactly what he did. The fact that he's gotten off with just a wrist slap only confirms my suspicions that Berger was acting on orders from Clinton and his traitorous Democrat politicos.

The bottom line is that Clinton and the Democrats put the fix in on the Commission from the beginning. In order to protect their hides and inflict as much damage on Bush as possible, it MUST be a Commission finding that Atta and the rest only came up on the intelligence radar AFTER the Bush Administration took over. All contrary evidence had to be hidden, discredited, or minimized. All evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 911 plot had to be squelched so that Democrats could portray Bush as a warmonger, instead of the deliberate, pro-American man he is.

The 911 attacks impacted an even deeper fundamental difference between modern Democrats and the rest of the country. Eight years of modern liberal leadership, for the first time in history in the US, resulted in a weakening of American might and security around the world. For the first time in US history terrorists felt secure in attacking the US - it started with US embassies, the USS Cole, and the '93 World Trade Center bombings. The half-assed reaction from the Clinton Administration only encouraged the terrorists to keep it up and even plan bigger murders.

I've said it from 9/12/01 onward - the 9/11 attacks were the fault of liberal and Democrat dogma pervading our foreign policy in the State Dept., intelligence organs, and politicians. The liberal and Democrat (pretty much the same thing these days) view of a global society requires that the US be humbled and stripped of any will or power to enforce freedom, human rights, economic fairness, and anti-terrorist/tyrant protection around the world.

Liberal/Democrat goals of world socialism, with Libs firmly in charge of course, are the reason that the UN is the center of corruption and scandal that it is, the reason that terrorists are emboldened, the reason that tyrants firmly hold on to their power, and the reason that millions of poor around the world starve. Liberals fall in to every terrorist trap due to their tenuous hold on reality and their ignorance of human nature. Liberals and Democrats only goal in life is power, over everyone and everything, and they'll do anything to get it and keep it.

Obviously, that includes allowing 3000 Americans to die on 9/11/01. But it also includes letting entire countries continue to suffer under tyrants (Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, etc.), letting entire peoples be exploited and killed (Sudan, Zimbabwe, China, etc.), and keeping all Americans in the dark about the true nature of the terrorist threat against us.

But the truth will aways come out in the end. If anyone still wonders why Democrats continue to lose election after election, I believe it's because more and more Americans see the bankruptcy and ignorance of their liberal positions. Increasing Democrat and liberal desperation to maintain power and advance their socialist agenda would be comical if it didn't involve placing so many Americans at risk at home, in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world. But terrorists know that their future is ensured by only one political party, one ideology, in the western world - Democrats and liberals.

I have a t-shirt that I bought during the last Presidential election: "10 out of 10 Terrorists Agree - ANYBODY but Bush". Another clue was Usama Bin Laden's cryptic but obvious endorsement of Kerry in the last election.

How much do you want to bet that the terrorist vote will go to Hillary in the next election? They owe her already for her part in making their lives easier due to the Democratic derailment of the 911 Commission.

Adios MF,

Doug

CAFTA, like NAFTA, is a political sell-out to big business

2005-07-28T12:51:00.001-07:00

It cracks me up to hear people position these free trade agreements as beneficial to Americans:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163840,00.html

They clearly are not, they only serve to make it more lucrative for big business to move factories and businesses overseas. NAFTA was a travesty, and CAFTA will be as well, these agreements are how politicians pay back political donors who helped get them elected. It's a stab in the back to the American worker who only wants to make a decent wage.

I don't agree with the extortion power of unions, they're just greedy and corrupt now. But I also don't agree with trade deals like this that benefit only the richest 1% of the country. American companies should not be allowed to move overseas just because of corporate greed. And please don't try to tell me that American companies can't make a profit in this country, it's only the greed of owners, management, and stockholders that encourages companies to screw their American workers.

Adios MF,

Doug

No-Talent Liberal Losers of the Year

2005-07-28T10:09:00.000-07:00

The decision is in! The judges have ruled and it's a tie! Beating out liberal moonbats, socialist idiots, and traitorous, ignorant celebrities/politicians who were miles ahead, Moby and Eminem come from behind to take the gold!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163921,00.html

Because of the fact that niether of these ball-less wonders has any socially or physically redeeming traits or positive intellectual qualities whatsoever, in the final tally they edged out the Dixie Twists (who are at least mostly pleasant to look at), Jane Fonda-Commies (who again, looks much better than a couple of no-talent, wussy, puling, teenage-boy hacks like Moby Prick and Phleminem), and Susan Saranwrap, Martin Dweeb, Michael Moore-on, Whoopi DumbasanIceberg, Jeanine GarBuffalo, Sean Has-Penn, and Tim "The Pussy" Robbins (just barely).

Just goes to show ya; you can take the trash out of the trailer, but you can't take the trailer out of the trash.

It'll be great to see all these moonbats fade into obscurity, slowly, painfully, as Americans increasingly reject their hypocritical, ignorant, self-centered, anti-American garbage.

Before I go, I need to add more idiots to the list though: Greed Day, Bruce LoserStein, Steven Spukeberg, Hitlery Clinton, Ted "The Swimmer" Kennedy, John "Scumbag" Kerry, Nancy Spewlosi, Robert Byrd-brain, Harry "Americans are Dumbasses" Reid, Chuck "Allahu Akbar" Schumer, and so on...

Too many more to name, unfortunately.

Adios MF,

Doug

American Muslim Group Issues Fatwa Against Terrorism

2005-07-28T09:49:00.000-07:00

Excellent, glad to see it! We don't see enough of this yet, but every step in the right direction helps.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163943,00.html

Now let's see muslims start turning in terrorists and those who help them. Let's see them stop giving money to terrorist groups, let's see the imams stop preaching hate and death, both towards Chistians and Jews, and in fact all others (except terrorists of course).

Sorry if I seem skeptical, but Islam has so much hate ingrained in it, directly supported by the Koran, and rulers of despotic muslim countries count on the hate to maintain their power base. When Iran, Syria, Palestine, Pakistan, Sudan, and Saudi Arabia issue their fatwas and begin jailing/executing terrorists at a brisk clip then maybe I'll believe Islam is a religion of peace, love, and justice for all, and not just for those in charge.

For now, pardon me if I continue to look at all muslims with a careful, wary eye.

Adios MF,

Doug

In Contrast to Judge Young, Coughenour Prefers Making Law

2005-07-27T15:19:00.000-07:00

It figures, a left coast judge is just as whacky as Judge Young (previous blog item) is pragmatic:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,163787,00.html

I don't see what you're bragging about Judge Coughenour, it seems to me that you let this animal off easy. You wasted millions of our taxpayer dollars when the military could just as easily and much cheaper dealt with this man. The military could have gotten the information out of this scumbag faster, and no one would have been in a position to convince him to stop cooperating. Terrorists ARE NOT American citizens (if they are, they should immediately be stripped of this and turned over to the military), they DO NOT deserve due process, they DO NOT deserve civil rights protections and lawyers.

So instead of being executed or imprisoned for life in a federal prison by a military tribunal, now this terrorist can look forward to a life of leasure in some PC left coast prison (where he is free to preach hate and terror against Americans, but not to smoke cigarettes), and possibly get out while he's still young enough to try it again.

I'm sure that had this terrorist succeeded in killing a massive number of Americans he would have then be let free by the terrorist loving liberal scum on the bench in most western US Courts. Coughenour couldn't resist making an unnecessary and inane political statement, he couldn't just do the job for which Americans pay him.

This judge is exactly the opposite of fine men like Judge Young (below), and the poster child for getting rid of liberal activists in our courts.

Adios MF,

Doug

Way to go Judge Young!

2005-07-27T14:42:00.001-07:00

Convicted shoe bomber Richard Reid was sentenced yesterday in Alexandria VA. Of course, none of the liberal media scum will report on Judge Young's sentencing, I had to get it by internet chain mail. But what a wonderful speech by Judge Young! It should be required reading for all leftist reports, politicians, and pundits.

There's at least one sitting Judge that is not a moonbat liberal whacko legislating from the bench, and my hat is off to him:

Ruling by Judge William Young, US District Court.

Prior to sentencing, the Judge asked the defendant if he had anything to say.

Reid's response: After admitting his guilt to the court for the record, Reid also admitted his "allegiance to Osama bin Laden, to Islam, and to the religion of Allah," defiantly stated "I think I will not apologize for my actions," and told the court "I am at war with your country."

Judge Young then delivered the statement quoted below:

January 30, 2003, United States vs. Reid. Judge Young: "Mr. Richard C. Reid, hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you.

On counts 1, 5 and 6 the Court sentences you to life in prison in the custody of the United States Attorney General.

On counts 2, 3, 4 and 7, the Court sentences you to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each count to run consecutive with the other. That's 80 years.

On count 8 the Court sentences you to the mandatory 30 years consecutive to the 80 years just imposed.

The Court imposes upon you each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 for the aggregate fine of $2 million. The Court accepts the government's recommendation with respect to restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17 to Andre Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines. The Court imposes upon you the $800 special assessment.

The Court imposes upon you five years supervised release simply because the law requires it. But the life sentences are real life sentences so I need go no further.

This is the sentence that is provided for by our statutes. It is a fair and just sentence. It is a righteous sentence. Let me explain this to you.

We are not afraid of you or any of your terrorist co-conspirators, Mr. Reid. We are Americans. We have been through the fire before. There is all too much war talk here and I say that to everyone with the utmost respect. Here in this court, we deal with individuals as individuals and care for individuals as individuals. As human beings, we reach out for justice.

You are not an enemy combatant. You are a terrorist. You are not a soldier in any war. You are a terrorist. To give you that reference, to call you a soldier, gives you far too much stature. Whether it is the officers of government who do it or your attorney who does it, or if you think you are a soldier. You are not----you are a terrorist. And we do not negotiate with terrorists. We do not meet with terrorists. We do not sign documents with terrorists. We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice.

So war talk is way out of line in this court. You are a big fellow. But you are not that big. You're no warrior. I've known warriors. You are a terrorist. A species of criminal that is guilty of multiple attempted murders. In a very real sense, State Trooper Santiago had it right when you first were taken off that plane and into custody and you wondered where the press and where the TV crews were, and he said: "You're no big deal."

You ARE no big deal.

What your able counsel and what the equally able United States attorneys have grappled with and what I have as honestly as I know how tried to grapple with, is why you did something so horrific. What was it that led you here to this courtroom today?

I have listened respectfully to what you have to say. And I ask you to search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable hate led you to do what you are guilty and admit you are guilty of doing. And I have an answer for you. It may not satisfy you, but as I search this entire record, it comes as close to understanding as I know.

It seems to me you hate the one thing that to us is most precious. You hate our freedom. Our individual freedom. Our individual freedom to live as we choose, to come and go as we choose, to believe or not believe as we individually choose. Here, in this society, the very wind carries freedom. It carries it everywhere from sea to shining sea. It is because we prize individual freedom so much that you are here in this beautiful courtroom. So that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is administered fairly, individually, and discretely. It is for freedom's sake that your lawyers are striving so vigorously on your behalf and have filed appeals, and will go on in their representation of you before other judges.

We Americans are all about freedom. Because we all know that the way we treat you, Mr. Reid, is the measure of our own liberties. Make no mistake though. It is yet true that we will bare any burden; pay any price, to preserve our freedoms.

Look around this courtroom. Mark it well. The world is not going to long remember what you or I say here. Day after tomorrow, it will be forgotten, but this, however, will long endure. Here in this courtroom and courtrooms all across America, the American people will gather to see that justice, individual justice, justice, not war, individual justice is in fact being done. The very President of the United States through his officers will have to come into courtrooms and lay out evidence on which specific matters can be judged and juries of citizens will gather to sit and judge that evidence democratically, to mold and shape and refine our sense of justice.

See that flag, Mr. Reid? That's the flag of the United States of America. That flag will fly there long after this is all forgotten. That flag stands for freedom. And it always will.

Mr. Custody Officer. Stand him down.

Well done Judge Young, I'm standing up for you.

Adios MF,

Doug

Liberal Reporters Outed Plame, Not Rove

2005-07-15T12:00:00.000-07:00

Ha! End of controversy, except the wailing of the partisan leftists in congress:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162583,00.html

It cracks me up that the Democrat furor over this will only serve to highlight that their liberal operatives in the leftist media are the real criminals. As if anyone need confirmation that liberals are among the biggest criminals in our country. It's a liberal standard these days that they ignore the laws they don't like.

But I'm in too big of hurry today to get into the details. Suffice to say, liberals are the biggest hindrance to progress in our nation today. Enough said.

Adios MF,

Doug

UBL and Saddam - Solidly Linked, Liberal Gainsaying Notwithstanding

2005-07-12T14:58:00.000-07:00

Next time you hear a liberal like Martin Frost, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, or Hillary Clinton spout off that "Saddam had NOTHING to do with 911, it's a fact!", point them to this article. Brit Hume of Fox News has a great interview with Steven Hayes of The Weekly Standard:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162247,00.html

If a simple journalist can discover and report on the pre-9/11 links that Al Queda had with Saddam Hussein's Iraq, why can't these powerful Senators and ex-congressmen 'get' this? Possibly because they don't want it to be true? If true, and I think Saddam DID have a role in 9/11, either indirectly through funding, or directly with intelligence, equipment, or document support, then the War on Terror's foray into Iraq is not only justified, but required by our constitution. Iraq would have committed an act of war against the US, and our retaliation was justified and necessary.

Can't have that of course if you're busy undermining the US Military and the President at every turn, like most liberals. Liberal is too soft a word for these idiots, but rather than resort to profanity I'll just call them traitors and socialists, all. Those terms have the benefit of being highly accurate and still 'clean'. If Democrats (liberals by another name these days) had simply joined forces with the rest of the country Iraq would have been a much easier and less humanly expensive endeavor. I hold Democrats responsible for much of the innocent Iraqi blood spilled by Al Queda and other home grown terrorists in Iraq. Not to mention the lives of our soldiers wasted while Democrats attempt their power grab in a desparate attempt to remain relevant in modern US politics.

Democrats these days will stop at nothing, not even treason, to regain their lost power in our government. They'll let ANYONE suffer and die if it can be used to attack the Bush administration or our military's resolve. The proof is in the pudding - quod erat demonstratum - the facts speak for themselves; I'm sure that terrorists who are allowed to vote in the US (and I'm sure there are some) voted hands down for John Kerry in the last election. They want a return to the 'it's our fault' and 'what terrorism?' stance of the Clinton administration.

Fat chance. If this country has any common sense at all we'll NEVER have another liberal administration.

Democrat policy and leadership is a major reason that terrorism is so widespread and popular today. Years of weakening the CIA , FBI, and NSA, infiltrating these formerly fine institutions with liberal paper-pushers who would prefer that terrorism not be a national security issue (makes their jobs harder - gotta fix a national security threat), and decades of funding cuts have made our anti-terror efforts second-rate. What's worse is that even today after a DIRECT ASSAULT on our country by terrorists, our liberal Democrat leaders still would prefer not to protect us - additional attacks under a Republican administration (not to mention a demoralized military ala Vietnam tactics) will help them regain power.

It's probably a good idea that these ignorant liberal scumbags who somehow get elected to our country's leadership prefer to remain ensconsed in their ivory towers over off of Connecticut Avenue in DC. If I ever met Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, or Harry Reid face to face, or worse that lunatic Dean, I doubt I would be able to control myself - their betrayal of the public trust is simply too heinous to contemplate for long. To them I can only say:

"It's not YOUR government, or the Republican's. It's OURS, the American People's. You WILL do what we say, you only have power because we allow it. History will, correctly, preserve your legacy of treason and betrayal forever."

And actually, if Ted and John had to run for election ANYWHERE else besides the People's Republic of Massachusetts, their socialist, treasonous butts would be laughed off the podium. Or worse - most areas of the country does not tolerate cowards and traitors, not sure why Mass. does.

Adios MF,

Doug

My Sincere Condolences Britain

2005-07-07T08:53:00.000-07:00

My heart goes out to the British people, in particular those in London who are victims of today's terrorist attacks, and their families.

Damn all those who would murder in such a cowardly and evil manner. If these attacks were indeed caused by those calling themselves Muslims, as it looks to be, my anger continues to boil over at Muslim 'leaders' who remain silent about the mass murderers in their midst. These murderers are simply cowardly losers, unable to cope with a changing world and lashing out in their self-pity, they should be treated as such by moderate Muslims. Moderate silence just confirms the false opinion that all Muslims are killers.

We in the US consider an attack on our friends an attack on us all. We stand with Britain in their time of sadness and anger, trusting in the resolve and dedication of our two peoples to ultimately succeed in a truly free and democratic vision of the world. Theocratic fascism will suffer the same fate as nationalistic fascism in WWII, we will see to it personally even if the rest of the world prefers to wallow in socialist and appeasement doctrine. W said it best long ago after 9/11, "In the fight against terrorism you're either with us or against us."

"Us" includes Britain, now more then ever.

Adios MF,

Doug

African Aid - Money for Murderers

2005-07-05T09:19:00.000-07:00

Wes Pruden hits another home run in his usual clear-headed fashion. African aid is a waste of time and money until true democracies reign across the continent:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/pruden.htm

The Millenium Challenge (where US aid is tied to pro-democracy, anti-corruption efforts by African countries) is a great idea from the Bush Administration, but we have to have the will to implement it properly. That means NO other aid will go to a nation that is ruled by corrupt leaders, that has no effective means for punishing crime and terrorism, who ignore human rights violations, and who refuse to care for their own people. The net effect of this implementation will be highlighting the corruption of Kenya, Nigeria, Somalia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, etc. - just about EVERY country on that continent.

Too bad the UN can't seem to bring attention to the massive corruption in Africa. That is, after all, a large part of the job they're supposed to be doing. Maybe it's because those corrupt nations take American aid and use it to bribe UN officials for committe appointments, blind eyes, and positive PR campaigns?

The very large downside to The Millenium Challenge idea is that the criminals who currently run most African nations WILL NOT be reformed, they must be removed. And consequently, the poor will continue to suffer and die. The MC can have no success if it has no teeth. It will have no teeth unless the world can agree that we need to unite against African corruption - tough love as Pruden says. The world will never agree under the current criminals at the UN. I don't see any hope for Africa until the UN is fixed or replaced.

Now if The Millenium Challenge is administered by the US, and under strict adherence, it could work. No other country in the world is as generous as the US, and none will give money or resources if the US says it will be wasted. One would hope anway. No other country can give on the scale of the US, and lesser amounts are pretty much useless.

Of course this is what the UN is supposed to do - if the US does it why do we need the UN again?

The Live 8 concerts are good for raising awareness, but Bono and the rest have no clue how to actually solve the problem. It makes the millionaire musicians and their pampered following feel good and brings attention to the problem, but it is otherwise a waste of time. Bono and his pals should try bringing attention to the corruption in Africa - THAT's the real problem, not lack of aid. Throwing good money after bad is not something Americans are willing to do anymore. Especially when Zimbabwe, Sudan, Somalia, South Africa, Uganda, Kenya, and many more African nations repeatedly show the world nothing but genocide, racism, slavery, greed, rape, murder, terrorism, and exploitation.

Adios MF,

Doug

SC Justice Souter - Economic Bottleneck!

2005-06-29T20:03:00.000-07:00

I love the story out of New Hampshire that a local developer has started an official proceeding to seize Justice Souter's home and land in order to build a hotel. He cites the very ruling that Souter and his socialist pals on the SCOTUS used to justify the theft of others' lands.

http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty1.html

WOOOOOHOOOO! Brilliant!!! Let's include the rest of the liberal scum on the court in this strategy pronto! And then the developer/town who brought the suit against the homeowners in the first place.

Makes me proud to be an American.

Adios MF,

Doug

NYC Says "Hell No!" to UN Expansion

2005-06-29T15:05:00.000-07:00

WAY TO GO NEW YORKERS! The UN wants to expand into a NYC park, building an office building instead. NYC has so far successful said 'forgeddaboudit':

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161082,00.html

I especially like the state senator's comment: "I don't get why anyone would want to give any approvals to this organization when it's continuing to come out that the different leaders within the U.N. have involvements with corruption and malfeasance.”

I wish all politicians would be so honest and forthright, too bad the article didn't give his/her name.

Keep it up NYC, let the UN live in that rat-infested death trap in Turtle Bay until they get sick enough to leave on their own. Actually, it's a great analogy, the four-legged rats against the two-legged kind: WWF Presents The Turtle Bay Death Match! Winner takes all! My money's on the two-legged rats, longer reach.

US OUT OF UN, UN OUT OF US!

Adios MF,

Doug

Liberals Want Your House

2005-06-26T15:15:00.000-07:00

I'm VERY fired up about the recent Supreme Court decision that applies eminant domain, EMINANT DOMAIN?!, to property rights when the government decides it's 'economically justified'. Christopher Orlet says it all in his commentary on The American Spectator:

http://www.theamericanspectator.com/dsp_article.asp?art_id=8349

In pre-revolution New England there were many instances of the 'Crown' seizing property, money, and valuables for all kinds of reasons - The American Revolution wasn't just about saying no to 'taxation without representation'. In Britain, including the American colonies in the 1700s, and even now the monarchy can appropriate any property he/she chooses, with or without compensation. The United States of America was founded in part to correct this. I will not stand by and accept this decision, the Supreme Court did not write our constitution, and it does NOT make our laws, end of story. Justice Stevens and the rest of his commie liberal scumbags can just try enforcing that crap, we'll have another civil war - and we've also still managed to keep our guns, no thanks to the liberals. And there isn't an American soldier or law enforcement professional in the country who will back the SC on this.

The first rule of communism is take all the guns. The second is take all the property. The third is kill all who disagree. Rule number one hasn't worked - don't try number two or three without 'number one' successfully completed Justice Stevens, homey don't play that.

We fought a revolution in part to guarrantee our rights to property ownership, and now the Supreme Court says that ownership is at the mercy of faceless beaurocrats and legal scoundrels, otherwise often known as lawyers. But this is the liberal plan for America, where government sits in judgement of every act, where they taketh and giveth at their whim and fancy, and where the elite will manage the great unwashed - when they can spare some time from their busy schedule at the country club. Socialists, as the TAS the article says, have no love for property rights - rights to property are the very antithesis of socialist principle in which the state owns everything. That modern 'liberals' are in fact socialists is no longer in doubt to any but the youngest and most naive among us.

If there was ever a clearer need to get judicial activism under control in our courts, I wasn't alive to see it. The Soviet-era KGB's Project Venona was designed to engineer just this outcome in our democratic society; warp the students and public information long enough with socialist blather and it will attempt to become mainstream, given help by leftist media. Project Venona was a masterful plan, no question. Last week's Supreme Court decision about property rights will forever in my mind be a KGB triumph as much as a tragedy of American justice.

IT CANNOT STAND. IT WILL NOT STAND.

George Bush:

The liberals/socialists are now tearing at the very heart of our economy, our most basic national identity, our country - our homes! Forget about all your foreign policy success and legacy - fix this or you will do down in history a failure, forever. Nominate a true, strict constructionist judge to ALL Supreme Court openings, now and forever. Get them accepted by Congress by any means necessary, or just ignore Congress and do a recess appointment. The people will back you on this all the way, including 'dis-electing' any who encourage the SC in their support for socialism.

Seems to me that the 'Minutemen' have come back to us just in time. We are ALL about to be Minutemen again, and for the same reasons as existed in 1775...except now the SC is the 'Crown'.

Adios MF,

Doug