One Stuffed Berger to go, please!

UFB! I haven't been able to blog lately, between the new job and the new band I've been pretty busy. But this story caught my eye and PISSED ME OFF. Where in the heck is the public outrage in the liberal media (and even FOX, Washington Times, etc.)! Sandy Berger STEALS secret and top secret government documents, destroys them, and gets off with a wrist slap:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,152108,00.html

I can't believe Clinton had the nerve to say that it was a Republican ploy, what a scumbag that man still is. And where is George Bush's new AG on this? Why isn't he launching a full investigation with a special prosecutor? What I see are political machinations to use the Terri Shiavo story to slip through unnoticed this betrayal of public trust and perversion of justice. Just when I thought I couldn't get any more disgusted with our public servants, and the media that bends over for them every time.

How are we ever going to find out what was in those documents? How will we now find out what part of the overall Clinton 911 Commission plot Sandy played? I'm convinced that Sandy Berger was the back door man who would steal/destroy documents and otherwise control what the full 911 Commission saw pertaining to Clinton's administration, as of course Bill's watch bears primary accountability for intelligence negligence prior to the 911 tragedy.

I can't remember the other players names now (I blogged about them both before, feel free to search my archives). But they were the female Dep. AG under Janet Reno, and that lefty lawyer, can't remember his name. The Dep. AG would ensure that the committee didn't press Clinton's CIA, NSA, FBI, and Justice heads, or any of his administration too deeply or lengthily, she was the Defense. She tossed Clinton's boys and girls softballs, and defended Clinton's policies with every breath. Even though she personally was in part directly responsible for the 'wall between criminal and counter-terror intelligence' that contributed to the lack of intelligence problem.

The lefty lawyer was the litigious attack dog, the Offense, going after Bush's gang and attempting to divert attention from Clinton's failures. He never passed an opportunity to ask a 15 minute question, during which he also gave the answers he wanted, an old slimy lawyer trick. My favorite part of those hearings was when Condi repeatedly and plaintively asked him to let her answer his questions.

Consequently, the 911 Commission Report is a nothing but a whitewash and public scam.

Even die-hard democrats have to shudder a bit at what Sandy is likely concealing. I know I do, a lot. Was Sandy hiding evidence of Clinton Admin. collusion with the UN Oil for Food scandal, evidence of Saddam/UBL connections, WMD evidence, etc.? He admitted to destroying the simple 'makes us look bad' documents, but I doubt that's all he stole. The number of events reported by witnesses is far more than just the two or three documents Berger admitted to.

Did 3000 people die because Bergler and Slick Willy were asleep (or screwing and intern) at the switch? Did our country suffer the most vicious terrorist attack in its history because Clinton administration National Security/Justice policy was don't share counter-terror information with the FBI? I happen to already believe the answer is yes to both questions, but I now despair of ever seeing proof. Sigh.

I'm very dissappointed in conservative media for letting this go by unchallenged. Are they that myopic that they can't see the obvious opportunism of the timing of Sandy's misdemeanor announcement?

And while we're on the subject of getting away with crimes and lies, why haven't at least the conservative media found out about the dishonorable discharge in John Kerry's military files?

Adios MF,

Doug