Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Border Patrol: Arrested for Doing Their Jobs

And for doing their jobs heroically in my view. My compliments to the two border patrol agents, and condolences that their fantastic work is now being punished. If anyone wonders whether our federal government is interested in securing our borders, please read this story:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20060823-122228-3575r.htm

The answer is obviously "NO". This story makes me so livid I can't even think straight. Especially the fact that the DHS AG went into Mexico to offer this drug smuggler immunity, and then a basis for a 5 million dollar lawsuit. I wonder what would happen if the AG went after people who broke our laws in order to PROSECUTE them?

FIRE EVERYONE INVOLVED! REVERSE THIS RIDICULOUS DECISION!

Can you believe this horseshit?!

Adios MF,

Doug

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Even Fox News Occasionally Needs a Reminder

Below is my letter to Lis Wiehl of Fox News in response to her NYT-apologist drivel excusing the Times' (and seemingly, all journalists who betray secrets) betrayal of top secret government programs during war time.

I've become more and more alarmed lately with the leftward direction of Fox. With its kowtowing to major leftists like Hillary Clinton, Susan Estrich, and their shameful obeisiance to their part-owners, the Saudis, in PC-ing all discussions about Mulim terrorism, Fox is slowly morphing into a bastion of elitism like all the others. I know they are supposed to be 'fair and balanced', but does that mean they'll excuse treason? Only for journalists it seems:


Subject: NYT is a Treasonous Entity

(In response to your article on Foxnews.com: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209281,00.html)

As are you Lis, if you make excuses for media betrayal of your neighbors (like me). Today's media regularly and as a matter of course ignores the truth for its leftist, anti-Israel, anti-US agenda; it doesn't give a second thought to doctoring photos and using them as pro-terrorist supports, to ignoring the truth in favor of terrorist rendition of events. Today's media bends over backwards with moral ambiguity to allow killers of innocent women and children to obtain legitimacy. Now that the terrorists are poised to obtain nuclear weapons, you and like-minded media types will contribute to terrorist victory right up to the first nuclear holocaust on US or Israeli soil. Are you prepared to live with that Lis?

Our Muslim fanatic opponents hide behind women and children when fighting, targeting other women and children, so that any retaliation kills more innocents that can, with a complicit media, be blamed on the terrorist's opponents. Terrorists cut off the heads of innocent non-Muslims live on the web, they kidnap mothers so that their sons are forced to become suicide bombers, they gang-rape young women who have the temerity to walk out of their house without an escort, and they regularly use easily corrupted media types to promulgate their propaganda of hate and genocide. Modern reporters enable this despicable behavior by allowing it to succeed with their attacks on EVERYTHING we, the GOOD GUYS, are doing to stop it. This is why, with justifiable reasons, the entire western world distrusts and even despises the majority of media and their 'reporters'.

Articles such as yours that promote the NYT's bullshit excuses for their treason simply assist the media to continue their slander, lying, and betrayal of Americans and other freedom-loving people around the world. IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE IF OUR ENEMIES KNEW ABOUT THE WIRE-TAPPING AND FINANCIAL SNOOPING we are doing; telling them about it is treason. No question. In a former age when journalists cared about right and wrong, a newspaper revealing top-secret government programs during a time of war to the benefit of US enemies would be shuttered and its editors and reporters imprisoned.

Personally, I long for the days when traitors were taken out to the nearest wall and unceremoniously shot. Lis you obviously are missing the entire point of the war on terror - it's to ELIMINATE terror and terrorists! Those who would murder you, your children, your family, and everyone you know, combatant or not, to further their power-mad agendas. When you excuse the behavior of terrorist fronts like the NYT, you only lump yourself in with those who are part of the problem.

Name and address redacted.

Adios MF,

Doug

Thursday, August 10, 2006

These Senators are Selling Out Your Children!

ATTENTION ALL VOTERS! ATTENTION ALL VOTERS!

Below is a list of US Senators who voted for their shamnesty travesty, a bill that is UNIVERSALLY reviled in the electorates they claim to represent, and everywhere. Anyone who is concerned about the unchecked flood of illegal aliens across our borders, and who thought our elected leaders in the Senate will actually FIX the problem, need to take notice of these names. The Senate bill is a clear disaster for our country, and completely against the desires of everyone except the Senators and their campaign contributors.

All Senators who voted for this sell out - there just isn't any other word for it - MUST be defeated in their coming elections in '06 and '08. Anything that the 'esteemed' Democrat Senators from Mass., NY, Wisconsin, RI, MD, CA, and WA agree on MUST be bad for us all. The fact that McCain and Spector are for it on the Republican side is just as big an indicator!

The vast majority of the US is very much FOR the House bill that would seal our borders FIRST and foremost. Closing the border is step one, but eliminating the demand by enforcing our current immigration laws is also required if we want to do this the SMART way. Then we can decide what to do with the criminals who broke our laws coming here.

I post this list here and will be reposting it often in the hopes that it will assist others who wish to hold these Senators to their votes, their explanations ought to be interesting during the campaign.

Alaska: Stevens (R-AK)
Arizona: McCain (R-AZ)
Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Pryor (D-AR)
California: Boxer (D-CA), Feinstein (D-CA)
Colorado: Salazar (D-CO)
Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Lieberman (D-CT)
Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Carper (D-DE)
Florida: Martinez (R-FL)
Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Inouye (D-HI)
Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Obama (D-IL)
Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Lugar (R-IN)
Iowa: Harkin (D-IA)
Kansas: Brownback (R-KS)
Louisiana: Landrieu (D-LA)
Maryland: Mikulski (D-MD), Sarbanes (D-MD)
Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Kerry (D-MA)
Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Stabenow (D-MI)
Montana: Baucus (D-MT)
Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE)
Nevada: Reid (D-NV)
New Jersey: Lautenberg (D-NJ), Menendez (D-NJ)
New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM)
New York: Clinton (D-NY), Schumer (D-NY)
North Dakota: Dorgan (D-ND)
Ohio: DeWine (R-OH), Voinovich (R-OH)
Oregon: Wyden (D-OR)
Pennsylvania: Specter (R-PA)
Rhode Island: Chafee (R-RI), Reed (D-RI)
South Carolina: Graham (R-SC)
South Dakota: Johnson (D-SD)
Vermont: Jeffords (I-VT), Leahy (D-VT)
Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Murray (D-WA)
West Virginia: Rockefeller (D-WV), Not Voting
Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Kohl (D-WI)

Adios MF,

Doug